Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NGT Order for Disregarding Earlier Supreme Court Direction. NGT's Disposal of OA Without Considering Appellant's Objections Held Indefensible; OA Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti, challenged an order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 11 February 2019 before the Supreme Court. The background involves a dispute over a proposal for exchange of land with forest land alleged to have been encroached upon. Earlier, on 8 February 2019, the Supreme Court had disposed of a previous civil appeal, noting that the NGT's order dated 5 December 2018 was interlocutory and that any decision by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MOEF&CC) and the Haryana Forest Department must be in accordance with law. The Supreme Court also observed that since the Original Application (OA) was pending before the NGT, this would not come in the way of the appellant pursuing its remedies in the pending proceedings. However, on 11 February 2019, the NGT, without awaiting a copy of the Supreme Court's order, proceeded to dispose of the OA, stating that the steps in furtherance of the proposal should be expedited and that the OA stood disposed of. The appellant contended that this order shut it out from seeking redress. The Supreme Court found that the NGT had misconstrued its earlier order and had failed to allow the appellant to address its objections. The Court held that the NGT's action was indefensible and set aside the impugned order, restoring OA 124 of 2017 to the NGT for fresh consideration in accordance with the Supreme Court's directions. The appeal was allowed with no costs.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Judicial Discipline - Binding Nature of Supreme Court Orders - National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - The NGT disposed of an OA based on a misinterpretation of the Supreme Court's earlier order, effectively shutting out the appellant from raising objections. The Supreme Court held that the NGT was duty-bound to follow its order and that the impugned order was indefensible. The OA was restored to the NGT for fresh consideration in accordance with the Supreme Court's directions (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) acted in accordance with the Supreme Court's order dated 8 February 2019 when it disposed of the Original Application without considering the appellant's objections.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the NGT's order dated 11 February 2019 in its entirety, and restored OA 124 of 2017 to the file of the NGT for fresh consideration in accordance with the Supreme Court's order dated 8 February 2019. No costs.

Law Points

  • Interlocutory orders
  • Judicial discipline
  • Binding nature of Supreme Court orders
  • Restoration of proceedings
  • Environmental law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (4) 48

Civil Appeal No.3571 of 2019

2019-04-16

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta

Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Varun Mahalawat, Adv.; Mr. Siddharth S. Yadav, Adv.; Mr. Nishant Anand, Adv.; Mr. Varun Deswal, Adv.; Ms. Mallika, Adv.; Mr. Prateek, Adv.; Abhigya, AOR; Adity Vaibhav Singh, Adv.; Ms. Rekha Ahgara, Adv.; Ms. Sneha Siddharth, Adv. for Appellant; Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Shyel Trehan, Adv.; Mr. Raghav Anand, Adv.; Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv.; Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR; Mr. Anil Grover, AAG; Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.; Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv.; Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. for Respondents

Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against an order of the National Green Tribunal disposing of an Original Application without considering the appellant's objections.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to have the NGT's order set aside and the OA restored for consideration of its objections.

Filing Reason

The NGT disposed of the OA on 11 February 2019, allegedly in disregard of the Supreme Court's earlier order dated 8 February 2019, which allowed the appellant to pursue its remedies in the pending proceedings.

Previous Decisions

The NGT had passed an order on 5 December 2018 (interlocutory) and the Supreme Court on 8 February 2019 disposed of the earlier appeal, noting that the NGT's order was interlocutory and that the appellant could pursue remedies in the pending OA.

Issues

Whether the NGT's order dated 11 February 2019 was in compliance with the Supreme Court's order dated 8 February 2019. Whether the NGT erred in disposing of the OA without allowing the appellant to address its objections.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: The NGT's order shut out the appellant from seeking redress; the Supreme Court's order intended that objections be considered by the NGT. Fourth Respondent: The fourth respondent had already taken steps to dismantle the wall; the NGT's order was in furtherance of earlier directions; the Court may restore the OA or allow the appellant to pursue remedies after final decision by State and MOEF&CC.

Ratio Decidendi

The NGT is duty-bound to follow the orders of the Supreme Court. Disposing of an OA without considering the appellant's objections, based on a misinterpretation of the Supreme Court's order, is indefensible. The NGT must allow the appellant to address its objections in the pending proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The NGT was duty bound to follow the order of this Court and we are constrained to observe that this has not been done. The consequence of the impugned order is to effectively shut out the appellant from addressing its objections to the proposed exchange before the NGT. In our view, this course of action, which has been followed by the NGT, is indefensible.

Procedural History

The NGT passed an interlocutory order on 30 October 2018 and a subsequent order on 5 December 2018. The appellant challenged the 5 December 2018 order before the Supreme Court, which disposed of the appeal on 8 February 2019, noting the interlocutory nature and allowing the appellant to pursue remedies in the pending OA. On 11 February 2019, the NGT disposed of the OA without considering the appellant's objections. The appellant then filed the present civil appeal against the 11 February 2019 order.

Acts & Sections

  • National Green Tribunal Act, 2010:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NGT Order for Disregarding Earlier Supreme Court Direction. NGT's Disposal of OA Without Considering Appellant's Objections Held Indefensible; OA Restored for Fresh Adjudication.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses NOIDA's Appeals Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications and Compensation Direction. Acquisition Notifications Quashed Due to Illegal Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.