Supreme Court Orders CBI Investigation in Suspicious Death Case. Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in the Investigation of a Judicial Officer's Wife's Death.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court has directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the death of Ranjana Diwan, the wife of a senior judicial officer. The Court's decision overturns the High Court of Chhattisgarh's dismissal of the appellants' writ petition, which sought a fair investigation into what they believe to be a suspicious death rather than a suicide. The Court's intervention aims to dispel doubts about the fairness of the local police investigation and ensure justice for the deceased.

1. Background and Context

Date of Incident: May 12, 2016 Deceased: Ranjana Diwan, wife of Respondent No. 7, a senior judicial officer. Initial Report: Death was reported as suicide by hanging with six ante-mortem injuries.

2. Key Events

Post-Mortem Report: Indicated asphyxia due to hanging with six distinct ante-mortem injuries. Police Investigation: Initially treated as a suicide; closure report filed without registering an FIR against Respondent No. 7. Appellants' Allegations: Suspected undue influence by Respondent No. 7 in the investigation process, citing lack of transparency and justice.

3. Legal Actions Taken

Writ Petition: Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking orders for a fair investigation, including the possibility of transferring the investigation to the CBI. High Court Decision: Dismissed the petition, suggesting that appellants should approach a Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC.

4. Supreme Court Decision

Order: Directed the CBI to conduct a complete and fair investigation into the case, overriding the High Court's decision. Reasoning: The Court noted the need for an independent investigation to address allegations of bias and influence by a senior judicial officer. Acts and Sections Discussed

**1. Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Section 174: Deals with the investigation of suicide or unnatural deaths. Section 156(3): Allows a Magistrate to order the police to investigate a cognizable offense.

**2. Constitution of India

Article 226: Grants the High Court power to issue writs for enforcement of fundamental rights. Ratio Decidendi

**1. Judicial Precedents

State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights: The Court can direct a CBI investigation when necessary to ensure justice and maintain public confidence in the investigation process. Bharati Tamang v. Union of India: Emphasized the importance of a fair investigation and accountability of the investigative agencies.

2. Principle

Independence of Investigation: The need for a fair and unbiased investigation in cases involving high-ranking individuals to ensure justice and maintain public trust in the legal system. Preventing Misuse of Influence: Ensuring that no undue influence affects the investigation process, particularly when allegations of bias exist.

Issue of Consideration: MANDAKINI DIWAN AND ANR. VERSUS THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.

2024 LawText (SC) (9) 65

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO………………….OF 2024 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.) NO.12649 OF 2023)

2024-09-06

(VIKRAM NATH J. , PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE J.)

MANDAKINI DIWAN AND ANR.

THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders CBI Investigation in Suspicious Death Case. Ensuring Fairn...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismissed the Petition of Petitioner Challenging Land Acqui...