Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Candidates Seeking Appointment from Expired Ranked List. No Right to Appointment Arises After Ranked List Expiry, Even for Vacancies Reported Later.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by candidates empanelled in the first Ranked List (RLI) dated 11.9.2013 for the post of Sub Inspector of Police (Trainee) in Kerala. The appellants sought appointment against 93 Non-Joining Duty (NJD) vacancies reported to the Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) on 12.7.2016, after the expiry of the first Ranked List on 25.5.2015. The background involved a protracted selection process beginning with a 2007 notification, a preliminary objective test, and litigation challenging the consolidated ranked list. The Kerala Administrative Tribunal initially directed bifurcation of the list, but the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the consolidated list on 13.10.2015. During the pendency of that litigation, a status quo order was passed on 3.11.2014. The KPSC made three advices from the first list, the last on 11.11.2015, and the list expired on 25.5.2015. A second ranked list was released on 26.5.2015. The appellants argued that the 93 NJD vacancies should be filled from the first list as they arose during its currency. The respondents contended that the list had expired before the vacancies were reported. The Supreme Court held that no candidate has a vested right to appointment from a ranked list after its expiry, and the status quo order did not extend the list's validity. The Court noted that the vacancies were reported after expiry, and the appellants could not claim a right to be considered. The appeals were dismissed, and the interim order directing the respondents to explore possibilities was vacated.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Public Employment - Right to Appointment - Expiry of Ranked List - The core issue was whether candidates empanelled in a ranked list have a right to be considered for vacancies reported after the list's expiry. The Court held that no candidate acquires a vested right to appointment merely by being included in a ranked list, and the list ceases to have effect after its expiry, unless vacancies were reported before expiry. (Paras 1-10)

B) Kerala Public Service Commission - Recruitment - Non-Joining Duty Vacancies - Reporting of Vacancies - The Court examined the nature of NJD vacancies and held that they are not 'existing' vacancies until reported. Since the 93 NJD vacancies were reported on 12.7.2016, after the first Ranked List expired on 25.5.2015, the appellants could not claim appointment from that list. (Paras 3-8)

C) Service Law - Interim Orders - Effect on Ranked List Validity - The Court considered the impact of interim orders (status quo) passed during litigation. It held that the status quo order dated 3.11.2014 did not extend the life of the ranked list beyond its expiry date, as the list expired by operation of law on 25.5.2015. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants, who were empanelled in the first Ranked List (RLI) dated 11.9.2013, are entitled to be advised/appointed against 93 Non-Joining Duty (NJD) vacancies reported to the KPSC on 12.7.2016, after the expiry of the said list on 25.5.2015.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed all the civil appeals, holding that the appellants have no right to be considered for appointment from the first Ranked List after its expiry. The interim order dated 24.9.2019 directing the respondents to explore possibilities was vacated. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Vacancy reporting
  • Ranked list expiry
  • Right to appointment
  • Non-joining duty vacancies
  • Kerala Public Service Commission rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (SC) (4) 6

Civil Appeal No. 2368 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 7189/2019) and connected appeals

2020-03-16

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.

Aneesh Kumar V.S. & Ors.

State of Kerala & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals against the judgment of the Kerala High Court dismissing petitions seeking appointment against NJD vacancies from an expired ranked list.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought direction to the respondents to advise/appoint them against 93 NJD vacancies reported on 12.7.2016 from the first Ranked List (RLI) dated 11.9.2013.

Filing Reason

The respondents declined to advise the appellants against the NJD vacancies on the ground that the first Ranked List had expired on 25.5.2015 before the vacancies were reported.

Previous Decisions

The Kerala High Court (Full Bench) dismissed the appellants' petitions vide judgment dated 21.2.2019, upholding the respondents' stand that the list had expired.

Issues

Whether the appellants have a right to be considered for appointment from the first Ranked List after its expiry. Whether the 93 NJD vacancies reported on 12.7.2016 can be filled from the first Ranked List which expired on 25.5.2015. Whether the status quo order dated 3.11.2014 extended the validity of the first Ranked List beyond its expiry date.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the 93 NJD vacancies arose during the currency of the first Ranked List and should be filled from that list. Respondents contended that the first Ranked List expired on 25.5.2015, and the vacancies were reported on 12.7.2016, after expiry, so no right accrues.

Ratio Decidendi

A candidate empanelled in a ranked list does not acquire a vested right to appointment against vacancies reported after the expiry of the list. The list ceases to have effect after its expiry, and interim orders do not extend its validity beyond the statutory period.

Judgment Excerpts

In a nutshell, the appellants have preferred these appeals to be advised (or appointed) against 93 NonJoining Duty (NJD) vacancies reported to the Kerala Public Service Commission (for short, “the KPSC”) on 12.7.2016 relating to the post of Sub Inspector of Police (Trainee). Respondents declined that demand on the ground that the Ranked List dated 11.9.2013 [for short “first Ranked List (RLI)”] (wherein the appellant(s) have been empanelled), had expired before the stated vacancies came to be reported.

Procedural History

The selection process began with a 2007 notification. The first Ranked List was published on 11.9.2013. Litigation ensued, with the Tribunal ordering bifurcation on 20.2.2014, which was upheld by the High Court on 8.8.2014. The Supreme Court granted status quo on 3.11.2014 and finally allowed the appeals on 13.10.2015, upholding the consolidated list. The first list expired on 25.5.2015. The second list was released on 26.5.2015. The appellants filed O.P. (KAT) petitions before the High Court, which were dismissed by the Full Bench on 21.2.2019. The present appeals were filed by special leave.

Acts & Sections

  • Kerala Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Candidates Seeking Appointment from Expired Ranked List. No Right to Appointment Arises After Ranked List Expiry, Even for Vacancies Reported Later.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes FIR Filed in Arunachal Pradesh, Citing Lack of Jurisdiction and Civil Nature of Dispute. Supreme Court rules that a civil dispute related to the sale of property in Rajasthan does not warrant criminal proceedings in Arunachal P...