Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Assistant Director Seeking Retirement at 60 Years Under Kerala University Act. Appellant Not a 'Teacher of the University' as Defined Under Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, and Not Entitled to Extended Retirement Age.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, P. Gopinathan Pillai, was appointed as Project Officer in the Centre for Adult Continuing Education and Extension (CACEE) of the University of Kerala on 26 December 1989, and later promoted to Assistant Director on 7 December 2012. He filed a writ petition before the Kerala High Court seeking a declaration that he was a 'teacher of the University' under the Kerala University Act, 1974, and entitled to continue in service until the age of 60 years, instead of the normal retirement age of 56 years applicable to CACEE staff. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the appellant was not a teacher of the University. The Supreme Court considered the definitions under Section 2(27) and 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, and the relevant statutes. The Court noted that CACEE was not a Department or institution established under the Act but a self-supporting centre originally funded by external agencies like UGC. The appellant's appointment was against a temporary post, and he was not engaged in teaching as a primary duty. The Court held that the appellant did not fall within the definition of 'teacher of the University' and was not entitled to the retirement age of 60 years. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to retire at 56 years.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Retirement Age - Definition of 'Teacher of the University' - Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974 - The appellant, appointed as Project Officer and later promoted as Assistant Director in CACEE, claimed to be a teacher of the University entitled to retire at 60 years. The Supreme Court held that CACEE is not a Department or institution established under the Kerala University Act, but a self-supporting centre funded by external agencies. The appellant was not appointed on a teaching post and did not satisfy the definition of 'teacher of the University' under Section 2(28). The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to retire at 56 years. (Paras 11-22)

B) Service Law - Retirement Age - Applicability of Statute 10 - Kerala University First Statutes, 1977 - Statute 10 provides that the age of retirement of teachers of the University shall be 60. However, the appellant, not being a teacher of the University, was not entitled to the benefit of Statute 10. The Court distinguished earlier judgments of the Kerala High Court relied upon by the appellant, noting they were decided on their own facts. (Paras 15, 22)

C) Service Law - Nature of Employment - Self-Supporting Centre - The CACEE was initially a temporary scheme sponsored by UGC and later restructured as a self-supporting centre. The staff of CACEE were not part of the University service and were governed by separate terms, including retirement at 56 years. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the appellant was not a teacher of the University. (Paras 18-22)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant, working as Assistant Director in the Centre for Adult Continuing Education and Extension (CACEE), is a 'teacher of the University' within the meaning of Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, and entitled to continue in service till the age of 60 years.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant is not a 'teacher of the University' under Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, and is not entitled to continue in service till the age of 60 years. The appellant was directed to retire at the age of 56 years.

Law Points

  • Definition of 'teacher of the University' under Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act
  • 1974
  • Retirement age of University teachers
  • Status of employees of self-supporting centres not established under the Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (SC) (4) 31

Civil Appeal No. 1641 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 26880 of 2016)

2020-02-14

Ashok Bhushan

Shri A. Raghunath for the appellant, Shri Jogy Scaria for the respondent

P. Gopinathan Pillai

University of Kerala & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against judgment of Kerala High Court dismissing writ petition seeking declaration as teacher of university and entitlement to retire at 60 years.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought quashing of High Court judgment and declaration that he is a teacher of the University of Kerala entitled to continue in service till age 60.

Filing Reason

Appellant was retired at age 56 instead of 60, claiming he is a teacher of the university.

Previous Decisions

Kerala High Court dismissed Writ Petition (C) No. 12179 of 2016 on 08.07.2016, holding appellant not a teacher of the university.

Issues

Whether the appellant is a 'teacher of the University' under Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974. Whether the appellant is entitled to retirement at age 60 as per Statute 10 of the Kerala University First Statutes, 1977.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he is a teacher as defined in Sections 2(27) and 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, and entitled to retire at 60 years, relying on UGC directions and earlier High Court judgments. Respondent University contended that CACEE is not a statutory department but a self-supporting centre, appellant was appointed on administrative temporary post, and retirement age for CACEE staff is 56 years.

Ratio Decidendi

An employee of a self-supporting centre not established under the Kerala University Act, 1974, who is not appointed on a teaching post and does not satisfy the definition of 'teacher of the University' under Section 2(28), is not entitled to the retirement age of 60 years applicable to University teachers under Statute 10 of the Kerala University First Statutes, 1977.

Judgment Excerpts

The only point to be determined in this appeal is as to whether the appellant working as Assistant Director in CACEE was entitled to continue till 60 years of age which was the age of retirement of Teacher of the Kerala University or he was to retire at the age of 56 years. The appellant admittedly was appointed in CACEE with effect from 26.12.1989 which received the sanction of the University by letter dated 01.02.1990. CACEE is not a Department or an institution or even a Study Centre instituted under the Kerala University Act, Statutes or Regulations.

Procedural History

Appellant filed Writ Petition (C) No. 12179 of 2016 before Kerala High Court seeking declaration as teacher and retirement at 60 years. Single Judge referred matter to Division Bench due to conflict in earlier judgments. Division Bench dismissed writ petition on 08.07.2016. Appellant filed SLP(C) No. 26880 of 2016 before Supreme Court, which was converted into Civil Appeal No. 1641 of 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Kerala University Act, 1974: Section 2(27), Section 2(28)
  • Kerala University First Statutes, 1977: Statute 2(f), Statute 10
  • Kerala University First Ordinances, 1978: Chapter XVII
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Assistant Director Seeking Retirement at 60 Years Under Kerala University Act. Appellant Not a 'Teacher of the University' as Defined Under Section 2(28) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, and Not Entitled to Extend...
Related Judgement
High Court "Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Decree: Tenant’s Non-Payment Claim Invalidated Due to Absence of Valid Notice" "Landlord’s eviction suit dismissed for failure to comply with procedural demand notice requirements under Maharashtra Rent Contro...