National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal Against Dismissal of Appeal Due to Delay, Subject to Payment of Costs. Delay of 137 days condoned on condition of paying Rs. 40,000 to complainant and depositing Rs. 10,000 in Legal Aid Account.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
  • 27
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by Ageas Federal Life Insurance Company against the order of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 31st July 2025, which dismissed the appellant's first appeal (FA/402/2025) on account of delay of 137 days. The appellant had filed IA/570/2025 seeking condonation of delay, but the State Commission found the grounds insufficient and dismissed both the IA and the appeal. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Commission heard the counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. Considering the nature of the case and the contention that the appellant has a good case on merits, the Commission set aside the State Commission's order and restored the appeal, subject to the appellant paying Rs. 40,000 to the complainant and depositing Rs. 10,000 in the Legal Aid Account of the State Commission within six weeks. The State Commission was directed to dispose of the appeal within four months. The parties were directed to appear before the State Commission on 14th November 2025. The Commission also stayed execution proceedings pending before the District Forum in CC/199/2022 until that date. It was clarified that if the amounts are not paid/deposited, the second appeal would stand automatically dismissed.

Headnote

A) Consumer Law - Condonation of Delay - Second Appeal - Delay of 137 days in filing appeal before State Commission - State Commission dismissed IA for condonation of delay and consequently the appeal - National Commission set aside the order subject to payment of Rs. 40,000 to complainant and deposit of Rs. 10,000 in Legal Aid Account of State Commission - Held that considering the nature of the case and grounds advanced, delay condoned on payment of costs (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Commission was justified in dismissing the appeal on the ground of delay of 137 days without condoning the delay, and whether the National Commission should interfere in second appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The order of State Commission in FA/402/2025 dated 31.07.2025 is set aside and the appeal is restored to its original number, subject to petitioner paying Rs. 40,000 to the complainant and depositing Rs. 10,000 in the Legal Aid Account of State Commission within six weeks. Execution proceedings stayed until 14.11.2025. SA/621/2025 disposed of.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Sufficient cause
  • Consumer Protection Act
  • 2019
  • Section 41
  • Section 67
  • Second appeal
  • Restoration of appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 13

SECOND APPEAL NO. NC/SA/621/2025

2025-09-24

AVM J. Rajendra AVSM VSM Retd.

Mr. Praveen Mahajan and Ms. Ruchi Mahajan, Advocates

Ageas Federal Life Insurance Company

Suma B N & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against dismissal of first appeal due to delay of 137 days.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of State Commission's order dismissing appeal and restoration of appeal.

Filing Reason

State Commission dismissed appeal on ground of delay of 137 days, finding grounds for condonation insufficient.

Previous Decisions

State Commission dismissed IA/570/2025 for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed FA/402/2025 on 31.07.2025.

Issues

Whether the delay of 137 days in filing the appeal before the State Commission should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the OP has a good case on merits and delay should be condoned.

Ratio Decidendi

Delay can be condoned on payment of costs if the appellant has a good case on merits, balancing the interests of both parties.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the nature of the case and the grounds advanced as well as the specific contention of the learned counsel for petitioner that the OP has a good case on merits, subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 40,000/- to the complainant; and depositing Rs. 10,000/- in the Legal Aid Account of State Commission, within a period of six weeks, the order of State Commission in FA/402/2025 dated 31.07.2025 is set aside and the FA/402/2025 is restored to its original number.

Procedural History

District Forum passed order in CC/199/2022 on 24.10.2024. Petitioner filed appeal before State Commission with delay of 137 days. State Commission dismissed IA for condonation and appeal on 31.07.2025. Petitioner filed second appeal before National Commission on 24.09.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Section 41, Section 67
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal Against Dismissal of Appeal Due to Delay, Subject to Payment of Costs. Delay of 137 days condoned on condition of paying Rs. 40,000 to complainant and depositing Rs. 10,000 in Legal...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death of Driver in Road Accident Held to Arise Out of and in Course of Employment. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Lack of Written Contract, and Commissioner'...