National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Transfer of Appeal from Non-Functional State Commission to Another State Commission Under Inherent Powers. The Commission held that Section 62 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 does not expressly confer power to transfer appeals, but inherent power exists to prevent failure of justice when a State Commission is non-functional.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
  • 37
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter pertains to a Transfer Application filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, the appellant, seeking transfer of an appeal pending before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, to the State Commission, Guwahati, Assam. The background involves a consumer complaint filed by Shri Jumpe Maro and others (respondents) against the appellant and the dealer, alleging deficiencies in service regarding a Mahindra XUV300 vehicle. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Papum Pare District, Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh, partially allowed the complaint on 31.03.2023, directing the opposite parties to pay Rs.1,70,000 to the complainant within 30 days, failing which interest at 12% per annum would accrue. The appellant filed an appeal before the State Commission, Itanagar, but the State Commission had not been functioning for almost 10 months due to non-appointment of the President and Members, resulting in no effective hearing. Meanwhile, the complainant was pressing for execution of the district forum's order. The appellant sought transfer of the appeal to a functional State Commission. The National Commission examined the issue of whether it has the power under Section 62 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to transfer a pending appeal or revision from one State Commission to another. The Commission noted that Section 62 only provides for transfer of complaints, not appeals or revisions. However, relying on the principle that procedural laws are meant to advance justice and not to defeat it, and considering the non-functional status of the State Commission, Itanagar, the Commission held that it has inherent power to transfer the proceedings to prevent failure of justice. The Commission transferred the appeal (FA No. 01 of 2023) from the State Commission, Itanagar to the State Commission, Guwahati, Assam, for adjudication on merits. The Commission also directed that the parties be given notice of the new hearing date and that the State Commission, Guwahati proceed expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Consumer Law - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 62 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Inherent Power - The issue was whether the National Commission has power under Section 62 to transfer a pending appeal from a non-functional State Commission to another State Commission - The National Commission held that Section 62 does not expressly confer power to transfer appeals or revisions, but the Commission has inherent power to do so to prevent failure of justice - The appeal was transferred from State Commission, Itanagar to State Commission, Guwahati (Paras 3-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the National Commission in exercise of powers under Section 62 of the Consumers Protection Act, 2019 can be presumed to be possessed of the power to transfer a pending Appeal or a Revision or any other proceeding before the State Commission (other than a complaint) to another State Commission or not?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Transfer Application is allowed. The appeal pending before the State Commission, Itanagar (FA No. 01 of 2023) is transferred to the State Commission, Guwahati, Assam for adjudication on merits. The State Commission, Guwahati is directed to give notice to the parties and proceed expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings
  • Section 62 Consumer Protection Act 2019
  • Inherent power
  • Non-functional State Commission
  • Consumer dispute redressal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 21

Transfer Application No. 9 of 2024

2025-05-21

Subhash Chandra, AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.)

Mr. Anand Shankar Jha for Appellant, Mr. Rajkumar for Respondent-1, NEMO for others

M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited

Shri Jumpe Maro, Managing Director (MD), Iconic Automobiles, General Manager (Sale), Iconic Automobiles, Service Manager, Iconic Automobiles

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer application seeking transfer of an appeal from a non-functional State Commission to another State Commission.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought transfer of pending appeal from State Commission, Itanagar to State Commission, Guwahati.

Filing Reason

State Commission, Itanagar was not functioning due to non-appointment of President and Members, causing delay and inability to challenge the district forum order.

Previous Decisions

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Papum Pare District, Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh partially allowed the complaint on 31.03.2023, directing payment of Rs.1,70,000 with interest.

Issues

Whether the National Commission has power under Section 62 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to transfer a pending appeal or revision from one State Commission to another State Commission?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the State Commission, Itanagar has not been in session for almost 10 months, no effective hearing, and execution proceedings are pending, causing prejudice. Respondent did not oppose the transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

The National Commission has inherent power to transfer proceedings from a non-functional State Commission to another State Commission to prevent failure of justice, even though Section 62 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 does not expressly provide for transfer of appeals or revisions.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue before us is that this Transfer Application be placed before a larger Bench... for an authoritative pronouncement on the question 'whether the National Commission in exercise of powers under Section 62 of the Consumers Protection Act, 2019 can be presumed to be possessed of the power to transfer a pending Appeal or a Revision or any other proceeding before the State Commission (other than a complaint) to another State Commission or not?' It has been ascertained from the State Commission and it is revealed that the State Commission is not functioning due to non-appointment of the President and Members.

Procedural History

Consumer complaint filed before District Forum, Papum Pare District, Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh, which was partially allowed on 31.03.2023. Appellant filed appeal before State Commission, Itanagar (FA No. 01 of 2023). State Commission non-functional for 10 months. Appellant filed Transfer Application No. 9 of 2024 before National Commission seeking transfer to State Commission, Guwahati.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019: 62
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Transfer of Appeal from Non-Functional State Commission to Another State Commission Under Inherent Powers. The Commission held that Section 62 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 does not expressly ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute, Upholds High Court's Determination of Market Value. The Court affirmed that compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be based on market value at the time of notif...