National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Act Case — Delay Condoned and Amount Deposited. The Commission held that an appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against orders passed by the State Commission in execution proceedings.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal filed by Subhash Chandra Singh against M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The appeal was directed against an order dated 30.04.2025 passed by the State Commission in Execution Application No. 120/2023 in CC No. 39 of 2025. The appellant sought condonation of delay in depositing the amount, exemption from filing certified copy and trial records. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, after hearing the advocates for the appellant, allowed the appeal and condoned the delay, subject to deposit of the amount. The Commission held that the appeal under Section 72 of the Act is maintainable against orders passed by the State Commission in execution applications.

Headnote

A) Consumer Law - Appeal - Section 72 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Maintainability - Appeal against order of State Commission in execution application - The Commission held that an appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against orders passed by the State Commission in execution proceedings, as the Act envisages appeal against orders passed by the State Commission under the Act. (Para 1)

B) Consumer Law - Condonation of Delay - Section 72 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Delay in depositing amount - The Commission condoned the delay in depositing the amount and allowed the appeal, subject to deposit of the amount as directed. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against an order passed by the State Commission in an execution application?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed the appeal, condoned the delay in depositing the amount, and granted exemption from filing certified copy and trial records, subject to deposit of the amount as directed.

Law Points

  • Appeal maintainable under Section 72 of Consumer Protection Act
  • 2019 against orders of State Commission in execution proceedings
  • Condonation of delay in depositing amount
  • Exemption from filing certified copy and trial records
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 30

AE No. 39 of 2025 with IA 9716 to 9719 of 2025

2025-08-11

Ms. Apoorva Rastogi, Mr. A. N. Singh

Subhash Chandra Singh

M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 72 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against order of State Commission in execution application

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought condonation of delay in depositing amount, exemption from filing certified copy and trial records, and setting aside of the State Commission order

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by the State Commission in Execution Application No. 120/2023

Previous Decisions

State Commission passed order in Execution Application No. 120/2023 on 30.04.2025

Issues

Whether the appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against an order passed by the State Commission in an execution application?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the appeal is maintainable under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and sought condonation of delay and exemption from filing documents.

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against orders passed by the State Commission in execution proceedings, as the Act envisages appeal against orders passed by the State Commission under the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which envisages Appeal against the orders passed by the State Commission under Section 72 of the Act.

Procedural History

The State Commission passed an order in Execution Application No. 120/2023 on 30.04.2025. The appellant filed an appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, along with applications for condonation of delay and exemptions.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019: 72
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Act Case — Delay Condoned and Amount Deposited. The Commission held that an appeal under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is maintainable against or...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Minor Driver Without License. Claimant pillion rider on Luna moped driven by minor friend without license; court apportions 50% contributory negligence r...