National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Settlement Reached Between Parties, No Further Payments Due. The Commission held that in view of the settlement, the execution application stood satisfied and no further amounts were payable by the judgment debtors to the decree holder.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the judgment debtors (appellants) against an order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh in EA/64/2023. The appellants, Chandigarh Royal City Promoters Pvt. Ltd., through its Director Daljit Singh, were the judgment debtors in execution proceedings initiated by Dr. Parveen Hans and four others (respondents/decree holders). The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided over by Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta (Member) and AVM J. Rajendra (Retd.) (Presiding Member), heard the appeal along with interim applications for stay, exemption from filing certified copy, and exemption from filing typed copies of documents. During the proceedings, it was brought to the Commission's notice that the parties had arrived at a settlement. In view of the settlement, the Commission observed that no further payments were due from the judgment debtors to the decree holder. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the execution application was disposed of as satisfied. The Commission also disposed of the pending interim applications.

Headnote

A) Consumer Law - Execution Proceedings - Settlement - Satisfaction of Decree - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - The appeal challenged the order of the State Commission in execution proceedings. The National Commission noted that the parties had settled the matter and no further payments were due from the judgment debtors to the decree holder. The appeal was allowed and the execution application was disposed of as satisfied. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the execution application was maintainable in light of the settlement between the parties and whether any further payments were due from the judgment debtors to the decree holder.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 19.11.2024 is set aside. The execution application EA/64/2023 stands disposed of as satisfied. Pending interim applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

Law Points

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • 2019
  • Execution Proceedings
  • Settlement
  • Satisfaction of Decree
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 36

AE/26/2025 (Appeal Execution No. 87 of 2024)

2025-08-12

Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, AVM J. Rajendra (Retd.)

Mr. Ramesh Rawat, Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Mr. Sambhav Sharma, Dr. M. K. Ravi, Mr. A. R. Tamboli, Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma

Chandigarh Royal City Promoters Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Daljit Singh

Dr. Parveen Hans & 4 Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order in execution proceedings under consumer law.

Remedy Sought

The appellants (judgment debtors) sought to set aside the order of the State Commission in execution proceedings and to have the execution application disposed of as satisfied.

Filing Reason

The appellants challenged the order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the State Commission, Chandigarh in EA/64/2023.

Previous Decisions

The State Commission, Chandigarh had passed an order in EA/64/2023 on 19.11.2024, which was under challenge.

Issues

Whether the execution application was maintainable in light of the settlement between the parties. Whether any further payments were due from the judgment debtors to the decree holder.

Submissions/Arguments

The parties had arrived at a settlement and no further payments were due from the judgment debtors to the decree holder.

Ratio Decidendi

In view of the settlement between the parties, no further payments are due from the judgment debtors to the decree holder, and the execution application stands satisfied.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the above, no further payments are/ due from the JDs to the DH. stand satisfied.

Procedural History

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh passed an order on 19.11.2024 in EA/64/2023. Aggrieved, the judgment debtors filed an appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, registered as AE/26/2025 (Appeal Execution No. 87 of 2024). The National Commission heard the matter and, noting the settlement, allowed the appeal and disposed of the execution application as satisfied.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Settlement Reached Between Parties, No Further Payments Due. The Commission held that in view of the settlement, the execution application stood satisfied and ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Approval of Appointment as Principal in Higher Education Service. Petitioner's appointment as Principal was approved by the University but not by the State Government, leading to denial of salary and ben...