Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Discharge from Section 307 IPC Charge — Medical Reports Prima Facie Show Attempt to Murder. Courts Below Erred in Appreciating Evidence at Charge Framing Stage; Charge Must Be Framed Under Section 307 IPC.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a criminal revision filed by the complainant, Bihari Lal, against the order of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur, which affirmed the trial court's decision to discharge respondent Nos. 2 to 4 (accused persons) from the charge under Section 307 IPC. The accused were facing prosecution for offences under Sections 307, 323, 325, 336, and 341 read with Section 34 IPC. The trial court, relying on two medical reports, found inconsistencies and held that no prima facie case under Section 307 IPC was made out, discharging them from that charge. The High Court upheld this order. The Supreme Court, however, found that both courts erred by appreciating evidence at the stage of framing charge, which is impermissible. The Court held that the medical reports prima facie disclosed an attempt to murder, and the charge under Section 307 IPC should have been framed. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the trial court to frame the charge under Section 307 IPC against the accused, while clarifying that the accused may argue after evidence is adduced that no case under Section 307 is made out.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 227 - Discharge - Prima Facie Case - The court at the stage of framing charge cannot appreciate evidence or find inconsistencies in medical reports; it must only see if a prima facie case exists. The trial court erred in discharging accused under Section 307 IPC by analyzing medical reports in detail. (Paras 11-15)

B) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 307 - Attempt to Murder - Framing of Charge - Medical reports filed by prosecution prima facie indicated an attempt to murder, hence charge under Section 307 IPC ought to have been framed. The High Court and trial court's orders set aside. (Paras 15-16)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the courts below were justified in discharging the accused from the offence under Section 307 IPC on the ground that no prima facie case was made out, based on appreciation of medical reports.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order set aside. Trial court directed to frame charge under Section 307 IPC against respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Accused may argue after evidence that no case under Section 307 is made out.

Law Points

  • Prima facie case for framing charge under Section 307 IPC can be made out from medical reports without appreciating evidence at the stage of framing charge
  • Appreciation of evidence and finding inconsistencies is a matter for trial
  • not for discharge
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (4) 121

Criminal Appeal No. 676 of 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.8823 of 2018)

2019-04-15

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari

H.D. Thanvi for appellant, Samar Vijay Singh for respondent Nos. 2-4, Anish Maheshwari for respondent No.1 (State)

Bihari Lal

The State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against order of High Court dismissing revision and affirming discharge from Section 307 IPC charge.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (complainant) sought setting aside of discharge order and direction to frame charge under Section 307 IPC against accused.

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by discharge of accused from Section 307 IPC charge based on appreciation of medical reports at charge framing stage.

Previous Decisions

Trial court discharged accused from Section 307 IPC; High Court affirmed in criminal revision.

Issues

Whether the courts below were justified in discharging the accused from the charge under Section 307 IPC on the ground that no prima facie case was made out, based on appreciation of medical reports.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that medical reports prima facie showed attempt to murder, so charge under Section 307 IPC should be framed. Accused argued that no offence under Section 307 IPC was made out based on medical reports.

Ratio Decidendi

At the stage of framing charge, the court cannot appreciate evidence or find inconsistencies; it must only see if a prima facie case exists. Medical reports prima facie disclosed an attempt to murder, hence charge under Section 307 IPC should have been framed.

Judgment Excerpts

The stage to appreciate the evidence with a view to find fault or/and inconsistencies in the two medical reports would arise only when the prosecution leads evidence by examining the doctors in support of the medical reports. Mere perusal of the medical reports filed by the prosecution would prima facie show that a case under Section 307 IPC is made out against respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and, therefore, the charge under Section 307 IPC should have been framed.

Procedural History

Trial court discharged accused from Section 307 IPC on 02.06.2018. High Court dismissed criminal revision on 12.09.2018. Supreme Court granted special leave and allowed appeal on 15.04.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307, 323, 325, 336, 341, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Discharge from Section 307 IPC Charge — Medical Reports Prima Facie Show Attempt to Murder. Courts Below Erred in Appreciating Evidence at Charge Framing Stage; Charge Must Be Framed Under Section 307 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Closes Petition on Dabhol Power Project Inquiry Due to Long Delay. Accountability of State Examined but No Further Inquiry Ordered.