Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Mediclaim Amount and Adjusts Multiplier. Driver's Licence Validity Upheld as Light Motor Vehicle Licence Covers Tempo Under Section 10(2)(d) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from an Award dated 1st February 2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in Application No.626/2017, awarding compensation of Rs.58,54,183/- with interest at 7.5% per annum to the claimant, Alka Vijay Chautray, for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 8th January 2015. The claimant was standing on the road when a tempo driven rashly and negligently by Bhalerao Adaji Katkar hit her. The insurer, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., contested the claim. The Tribunal held the driver negligent and awarded compensation. The insurer appealed on three grounds: (i) the driver's licence was for light motor vehicle (non-transport) whereas the tempo weighed 7500 kg, thus invalid; (ii) the claimant had received Rs.1,75,000 from mediclaim which should be deducted; (iii) the multiplier of 14 applied by the Tribunal was incorrect. The Court heard arguments from Mr. Sarthak S. Diwan for the appellant and Mr. Vasant N. More for the respondent-claimant. The Court examined the licence issue and held that under Section 10(2)(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a light motor vehicle licence covers transport vehicles with gross weight not exceeding 7500 kg, so the licence was valid. On the mediclaim issue, the Court held that the amount received from mediclaim must be deducted to prevent double compensation. On the multiplier, the Court applied the Sarla Verma guidelines and reduced the multiplier from 14 to 13 as the claimant was 48 years old. The Court partly allowed the appeal, reducing the compensation by Rs.1,75,000 and adjusting the multiplier, resulting in a modified award.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Driving Licence - Validity - Light Motor Vehicle Licence for Tempo - Section 10(2)(d) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The driver held a licence to drive light motor vehicle (non-transport) but the tempo had a gross weight of 7500 kg. The Court held that a light motor vehicle licence covers a tempo as the definition of light motor vehicle includes transport vehicles with gross weight not exceeding 7500 kg. The licence was valid. (Paras 4-5)

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Deduction of Mediclaim - Double Compensation - The claimant received Rs.1,75,000 from Star Health and Allied Insurance Company as mediclaim for the same injuries. The Court held that this amount must be deducted from the compensation awarded to avoid double recovery. (Para 6)

C) Motor Accident Compensation - Multiplier - Age of Claimant - The Tribunal applied multiplier of 14 based on the age of the claimant (48 years). The Court held that the correct multiplier as per Sarla Verma v. DTC is 13 for age 46-50. The multiplier was reduced to 13. (Para 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the driver's licence for light motor vehicle (non-transport) is valid for driving a tempo weighing 7500 kg; Whether the mediclaim amount received by the claimant should be deducted from the compensation awarded; Whether the multiplier applied by the Tribunal is correct.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The Court held that the driver's licence was valid. The mediclaim amount of Rs.1,75,000 shall be deducted from the compensation. The multiplier is reduced from 14 to 13. The award is modified accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Driver's licence for light motor vehicle covers tempo up to 7500 kg
  • Mediclaim amount received by claimant must be deducted from compensation
  • Multiplier to be based on age of deceased or injured
  • Notional income assessment for self-employed persons
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:47854

First Appeal No. 571 of 2024

2025-11-11

S. M. Modak

2025:BHC-AS:47854

Mr. Sarthak S. Diwan for Appellant, Mr. Vasant N. More for Respondents

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.

Alka Vijay Chautray and Bhalerao Adaji Katkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in injury claim

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation on grounds of invalid licence, deduction of mediclaim, and wrong multiplier

Filing Reason

Insurer challenged the Tribunal's award on three grounds: licence validity, mediclaim deduction, and multiplier

Previous Decisions

M.A.C.T. Mumbai awarded Rs.58,54,183/- with 7.5% interest per annum in Application No.626/2017

Issues

Whether the driver's licence for light motor vehicle (non-transport) is valid for driving a tempo weighing 7500 kg? Whether the mediclaim amount of Rs.1,75,000 received by the claimant should be deducted from compensation? Whether the multiplier of 14 applied by the Tribunal is correct?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: Driver's licence was for light motor vehicle non-transport, but tempo weighs 7500 kg, so licence invalid. Appellant: Claimant received Rs.1,75,000 from mediclaim, which should be deducted. Appellant: Multiplier of 14 is wrong; correct multiplier is 13 as per Sarla Verma. Respondent: Licence is valid as light motor vehicle includes tempo up to 7500 kg. Respondent: Mediclaim is a separate contract and should not be deducted. Respondent: Multiplier of 14 is correct based on claimant's age.

Ratio Decidendi

A light motor vehicle licence under Section 10(2)(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 covers transport vehicles with gross weight not exceeding 7500 kg, so a tempo weighing 7500 kg can be driven with such licence. Mediclaim amounts received for the same injuries must be deducted from compensation to avoid double recovery. The multiplier for compensation should be based on the age of the claimant as per Sarla Verma guidelines.

Judgment Excerpts

The driver of the insured vehicle was holding the licence to drive light motor vehicle non-transport whereas the tempo is having weight of 7500 kg. The claimant has received Rs.1,75,000/- from mediclaim of Star Health and Allied Insurance Company and as such this amount ought to have been deducted. The multiplier of 14 applied by the Tribunal is incorrect; the correct multiplier is 13 as per Sarla Verma.

Procedural History

Claimant filed Application No.626/2017 before M.A.C.T. Mumbai for injuries in accident on 8.1.2015. Tribunal awarded Rs.58,54,183/- on 1.2.2024. Insurer filed First Appeal No.571/2024 before Bombay High Court. Heard on 15.10.2025 and pronounced on 11.11.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 10(2)(d), Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Overturns Madras High Court’s Directions on Formula 4 Racing Event Funding and State Responsibility. Public-Private Partnership in Sports Events Upheld; State’s Role in Facilitating Events Clarified
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Mediclaim Amount and Adjusts Multiplier. Driver's Licence Validity Upheld as Light Motor Vehicle Licence Covers Tempo Under S...