Supreme Court Allows Disability Pension Arrears for Ex-Serviceman from 1995 to 2014. Denial of disability pension to a former soldier for the period between 1995 and 2014 was held misconceived as the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently, entitling him to arrears.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Madan Prasad Sinha @ Sanatan Baba, was enrolled in the Indian Army's Corps of Signals as a Radio Mechanic on 18 February 1971. He was discharged on 18 August 1981 under Army Rule 13(3) due to being placed in a low medical category, suffering from a Chronic Duodenal Ulcer allegedly resulting from participation in Operation Cactus Lilly in 1971. He sought war injury pension from the Armed Forces Tribunal, which was denied on the ground that the disability was not attributable to active operations. The Supreme Court, on 26 November 2018, confined the issue to whether the appellant should receive disability pension between 1996 and 2014. The respondents' counter affidavit included a chart of Re-Survey Medical Boards: disability assessed at 40% for two years from 14 July 1985; 20% for two years from 17 July 1987; 30% for five years from 17 July 1990; and 20% for ten years from 23 March 1994. However, the PCDA(P), Allahabad re-assessed the disability at less than 20% on 8 May 1995, leading to denial of pension from 24 March 1995. On 30 January 2014, the Military Hospital, Danapur Cantt assessed the disability at 20% permanently for life, and the appellant received pension thereafter. The Supreme Court found the denial of pension from 24 March 1995 to 30 January 2014 misconceived, as the disability element had been rounded off per previous Tribunal orders. The appeal was allowed, directing payment of arrears at applicable rates within three months.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Disability Pension - Entitlement to Arrears - Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 - The appellant, a former soldier discharged in low medical category due to chronic duodenal ulcer, was denied disability pension from 1995 to 2014 based on a re-assessment of disability at less than 20%. The Supreme Court held that the denial was misconceived as the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently from 2014, and the appellant was entitled to arrears for the intervening period at applicable rates. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to disability pension for the period between 24 March 1995 and 30 January 2014.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing that the appellant shall be granted arrears on account of disability pension in accordance with the applicable rates prevalent at the relevant time between 24 March 1995 and 30 January 2014. Computation and payment to be made within three months.

Law Points

  • Disability pension
  • Attributable to military service
  • Re-assessment by medical board
  • Arrears of pension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (4) 140

Civil Appeal No(s). 11485 of 2018

2019-04-08

Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta

For Appellant: Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv., Mr. Narender Singh, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. For Respondent: Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv., Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv., Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv., Ms. Alka Agrawal, Adv., Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv., Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv.

Madan Prasad Sinha @ Sanatan Baba

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against denial of disability pension arrears.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought disability pension for the period between 1996 and 2014.

Filing Reason

Appellant was denied disability pension from 24 March 1995 to 30 January 2014 due to re-assessment of disability at less than 20%.

Previous Decisions

Armed Forces Tribunal denied war injury pension; Supreme Court confined issue to disability pension arrears from 1996 to 2014.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to disability pension for the period between 24 March 1995 and 30 January 2014.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that his claim for disability pension between 1996 and 2014 was not considered. Respondents submitted a chart of Re-Survey Medical Boards showing varying disability assessments.

Ratio Decidendi

Denial of disability pension to a serviceman for the period between 1995 and 2014 was misconceived where the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently, and the disability element had been rounded off per previous orders.

Judgment Excerpts

The only issue which arises for determination in the present appeal is with regard to the grant of disability pension to the appellant. We accordingly, allow the appeal and direct that the appellant shall be granted arrears on account of disability pension in accordance with the applicable rates prevalent at the relevant time between 24 March 1995 and 30 January 2014.

Procedural History

Appellant enrolled in Army in 1971, discharged in 1981 in low medical category. He sought war injury pension from Armed Forces Tribunal, which was denied. Supreme Court on 26 November 2018 confined the issue to disability pension arrears from 1996 to 2014. After hearing, appeal allowed on 8 April 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Army Rules: Rule 13(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Disability Pension Arrears for Ex-Serviceman from 1995 to 2014. Denial of disability pension to a former soldier for the period between 1995 and 2014 was held misconceived as the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently, ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Bye-Election Notification for Goa Assembly Seat Due to Insufficient Remaining Term Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Court held that bye-election cannot be held as remainder of term for newly elected member would be les...