Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Lack of Reasoning in Dismissing Section 482 CrPC Petition. High Court's Order Set Aside as It Failed to Assign Reasons for Dismissal of Petition Challenging Summons Under IPC Sections 302, 325, 326, 331, 352 Read With Section 34.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the High Court of Judicature at Patna's order dated 28.03.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.5293 of 2019. The appellant, Jitender Kumar @ Jitender Singh, had filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenging the order dated 09.04.2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, which summoned him to face trial in Session Trial No.280 of 2016 for offences under Sections 302, 325, 326, 331, 352 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The High Court dismissed the petition without assigning any reasons, merely stating that the petition was devoid of merit. The Supreme Court found that the impugned order contained only facts, submissions, and quotations from decisions, but lacked any discussion or reasoning for the dismissal. The Court emphasized the necessity of giving reasons in support of conclusions, as it indicates application of mind. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and remanded the matter for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law, clarifying that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The parties were granted liberty to mention the matter for early hearing.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Section 482 CrPC - Duty to Assign Reasons - High Court dismissed petition under Section 482 CrPC without any discussion or reasoning - Supreme Court held that it is obligatory for courts to assign reasons in support of conclusion as it indicates application of mind - Impugned order set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision on merits (Paras 7-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the appellant's petition under Section 482 CrPC without assigning reasons.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order of High Court set aside. Matter remanded to High Court for deciding the petition afresh on merits in accordance with law. No opinion expressed on merits of the case. Parties granted liberty to mention for early hearing.

Law Points

  • Duty of courts to assign reasons for decisions
  • Necessity of reasoned order under Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (5) 31

Criminal Appeal No. 888 of 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.3502 of 2019)

2019-05-10

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari

Ms. Anjana Prakash (for appellant), Ms. Hemlata Ranga (for respondent)

Jitender Kumar @ Jitender Singh

The State of Bihar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against High Court order dismissing petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging summoning order.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of High Court order and quashing of summoning order.

Filing Reason

High Court dismissed appellant's petition under Section 482 CrPC without assigning reasons.

Previous Decisions

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui summoned appellant to face trial; High Court dismissed appellant's petition under Section 482 CrPC.

Issues

Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the appellant's petition under Section 482 CrPC without assigning reasons.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that High Court did not assign any reasons for dismissal. Respondent-State supported the High Court order.

Ratio Decidendi

It is obligatory for courts to assign reasons in support of their conclusions, as reasons indicate application of mind. A dismissal order without any discussion or reasoning cannot be countenanced.

Judgment Excerpts

In the entire impugned order, which consists of 13 paras, we find that the High Court did not assign any reason as to why the petition is liable to be dismissed. Time and again, this Court has emphasized the necessity of giving reasons in support of the conclusion because it is the reason, which indicates the application of mind.

Procedural History

Appellant filed petition under Section 482 CrPC before High Court challenging summoning order dated 09.04.2015. High Court dismissed petition on 28.03.2019. Appellant filed SLP before Supreme Court, which was converted into Criminal Appeal No. 888 of 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 325, 326, 331, 352, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Amended Recruitment Rules Equating Posts of Principal and Joint Chief Inspector of Factories as Infructuous Due to Retirement of Employee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Mala Fide; Period Between Transfer and Superan...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Lack of Reasoning in Dismissing Section 482 CrPC Petition. High Court's Order Set Aside as It Failed to Assign Reasons for Dismissal of Petition Challenging Summons Under IPC Sections 302, 325, 326, 331, 3...