Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Appointing Administrator for Archery Association of India — Directions Issued for Elections Under Amended Constitution. The Court held that the Administrator exceeded his authority by amending the constitution beyond the approved amendments and directed elections to be held under the Court-approved constitution.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a High Court order appointing an Administrator for the Archery Association of India (AAI). The High Court had appointed Mr. S.Y. Quraishi, former Chief Election Commissioner, as Administrator-cum-Returning Officer to oversee amendments to the AAI constitution and conduct elections in compliance with the National Sports Development Code of India 2011. The Supreme Court, on 4th December 2017, directed that specific deviations from the Code be rectified and that elections be held within four weeks under Mr. Quraishi's supervision. However, the Administrator subsequently filed a new constitution containing amendments beyond those approved by the Court, without seeking permission. The appellants, including the Maharashtra Archery Association, AAI, and Kerala State Archery Association, challenged this overreach. The Court noted that the Administrator's Constitution was not circulated to members and contained unauthorized changes. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court's order and directing that elections be conducted strictly in accordance with the constitution as approved by the Court on 4th December 2017, under the supervision of Mr. S.Y. Quraishi, with the Union of India to restore recognition upon compliance.

Headnote

A) Sports Law - Administration of National Sports Federation - Powers of Administrator - The Administrator appointed by the High Court cannot amend the constitution of a National Sports Federation beyond the amendments approved by the Supreme Court without seeking prior liberty from the Court. The Administrator's Constitution contained several unauthorized amendments and was not circulated to members before filing. (Paras 5-6)

B) Sports Law - Election Process - Compliance with National Sports Development Code - The Supreme Court directed that elections be held under the supervision of Mr. S.Y. Quraishi in accordance with the constitution as amended by the Court's order dated 4th December 2017, and that the Administrator ensure strict compliance with the National Sports Development Code of India 2011. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Administrator appointed by the High Court could amend the constitution of the Archery Association of India beyond the amendments approved by the Supreme Court in its order dated 4th December 2017.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. The High Court order dated 10th August 2017 is set aside. The Administrator, Mr. S.Y. Quraishi, is directed to conduct elections in accordance with the constitution as amended by the Supreme Court's order dated 4th December 2017, within four weeks. The Union of India is directed to restore recognition of the Archery Association of India upon compliance.

Law Points

  • Administrator's powers limited to court-approved amendments
  • National Sports Development Code of India 2011 compliance
  • Election supervision by former Chief Election Commissioner
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (5) 59

Civil Appeal No. of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Diary No.29577/2017) and connected appeals

2019-05-01

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.

Maharashtra Archery Association, Archery Association of India, Kerala State Archery Association

Rahul Mehra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals against High Court order appointing Administrator for Archery Association of India

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of High Court order appointing Administrator and directions for elections under Court-approved constitution

Filing Reason

Administrator exceeded authority by amending constitution beyond Supreme Court's approved amendments

Previous Decisions

High Court of Delhi appointed Mr. S.Y. Quraishi as Administrator-cum-Returning Officer on 10th August 2017; Supreme Court on 4th December 2017 directed specific amendments and elections within four weeks

Issues

Whether the Administrator could amend the constitution beyond the amendments approved by the Supreme Court Whether the Administrator's Constitution was valid without prior approval of the Court

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Administrator carried out amendments beyond what was permitted and approved by the Supreme Court, without discussion with members Respondent No.1 (writ petitioner) supported the High Court order

Ratio Decidendi

An Administrator appointed by a court cannot exceed the authority granted by the court's order and must seek prior approval before making any amendments beyond those approved. The constitution of a National Sports Federation must be strictly in compliance with the National Sports Development Code of India 2011.

Judgment Excerpts

The Administrator had carried out amendments beyond what was permitted and approved by this Court in terms of the order dated 4th December 2017, that too without any discussion with the members and stakeholders. The grievance of the appellant(s) is that the Administrator had carried out amendments beyond what was permitted and approved by this Court in terms of the order dated 4th December 2017.

Procedural History

Public Interest Litigation filed in 2010 in Delhi High Court; High Court appointed Administrator on 10th August 2017; Supreme Court heard appeals and passed order on 4th December 2017; Administrator filed compliance report with new constitution on 24th September 2018; appeals decided in 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • National Sports Development Code of India, 2011:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Appointing Administrator for Archery Association of India — Directions Issued for Elections Under Amended Constitution. The Court held that the Administrator exceeded his authority by amending t...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a fo...