Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Shikshan Sevak for Salary from Date of Appointment in Maharashtra Schools Act Case. Education Officer's Condition to Pay Salary from Date of Approval Quashed as Appointment Was Made After Following Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vikas Pandit Patil, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak by Respondent No. 4 (Higher Education Society, Shirala) at Respondent No. 5 School (Samaj Vikas Madhyamik and Uccha Madhyamak Vidyalaya, Sangaon) with effect from 1st July 2016. The school is fully aided. The appointment was made after the retirement of a teacher created a vacancy. The school management approached the Education Officer under Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 to ascertain availability of surplus teachers. Despite waiting for 8 years, no response was received, so the management published an advertisement and appointed the petitioner. The Education Officer granted approval but imposed a condition that salary be paid from the date of approval, not from the date of appointment. The petitioner challenged this condition. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to salary from the date of appointment as the delay was not his fault and the appointment was made after following due process. The court directed the Education Officer to release salary from the date of appointment and quashed the condition.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Shikshan Sevak - Salary from Date of Appointment - Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The petitioner was appointed as Shikshan Sevak on 1st July 2016 but approval was granted later with condition that salary be paid from date of approval. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to salary from the date of appointment, as the appointment was made after following due process and the delay in approval was not attributable to the petitioner. (Paras 1-7)

B) Service Law - Approval of Appointment - Liability for Salary - Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The Education Officer cannot impose a condition that salary be paid from date of approval instead of date of appointment, as the appointment was made after following the procedure under Section 5(1) and the school management had waited for 8 years for permission. The court directed that salary be paid from the date of appointment. (Paras 2-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Shikshan Sevak appointed by a private school is entitled to salary from the date of appointment or only from the date of approval by the Education Officer.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the condition imposed by the Education Officer, and directed that the petitioner be paid salary from the date of appointment i.e. 1st July 2016.

Law Points

  • Salary from date of appointment
  • Shikshan Sevak
  • Grant-in-aid
  • Approval
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
  • 1977
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-KOL:3784-DB

Writ Petition No. 12448 of 2025

2025-12-12

M. S. Karnik, Ajit B. Kadethankar

2025:BHC-KOL:3784-DB

Mr. Chetan G. Patil, Mr. Prathamesh P. Magadum, Mr. Gajraj A Mali i/b Mr. Bhushan S. Jahdav for the Petitioner; Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent-State

Vikas Pandit Patil

The State of Maharashtra, The Deputy Director of Education, The Education Officer (Secondary), Higher Education Society, Samaj Vikas Madhyamik and Uccha Madhyamak Vidyalaya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging condition imposed by Education Officer that salary be paid from date of approval instead of date of appointment.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to pay salary from date of appointment and quash condition.

Filing Reason

Education Officer granted approval but imposed condition that salary be paid from date of approval, not from date of appointment.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary from the date of appointment or from the date of approval.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that appointment was made after following due process and delay in approval was not his fault. Respondent State argued that salary should be paid from date of approval as per practice.

Ratio Decidendi

A Shikshan Sevak appointed after following the procedure under Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is entitled to salary from the date of appointment, and the Education Officer cannot impose a condition to pay salary only from the date of approval.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is duly appointed by Respondent No.4-Educational Institution as Shikshan Sevak at Respondent No.5-School. Grievance of the Petitioner in the Writ Petition is that despite having granted approval to the Petitioner’s appointment, the Education Officer has foisted a liability on the School Management to pay the honorarium/salary to Petitioner for the period from the date of appointment to the date of approval.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 12448 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging the condition imposed by the Education Officer. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 12th December 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977: Section 5(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Shikshan Sevak for Salary from Date of Appointment in Maharashtra Schools Act Case. Education Officer's Condition to Pay Salary from Date of Approval Quashed as Appointment Was Made After Following Section 5(1) of...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a ...