Supreme Court Quashes Further Investigation Order in Rape Case After Closure Report Acceptance -- Police Cannot Conduct Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) of CrPC Without Magistrate's Leave

  • 21
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the High Court's refusal to quash police orders for further investigation in a rape case after a closure report had been accepted by the Magistrate. The Court held that under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the police cannot conduct further investigation without obtaining leave from the Magistrate once a final report under Section 173(2) has been submitted and accepted. The case originated from an FIR in 2013, with a closure report filed in 2014 and accepted in 2015. Despite this, police orders in 2019 and 2021 directed further investigation based on NHRC directions, which the Court found illegal as they bypassed the Magistrate's authority. The Court quashed the impugned orders, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of Magistrate's leave for further investigation under CrPC.

Headnote

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the communication dated 06.06.2019 and order dated 26.04.2021, which directed further investigation in a rape case -- The Court held that after a final report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) is submitted and accepted by the Magistrate, the police cannot conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of CrPC without obtaining leave from the Magistrate -- The factual matrix involved an FIR registered in 2013 for offences under Sections 376D, 352, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) -- After investigation, a closure report was submitted in 2014, which was accepted by the Magistrate in 2015 after notices to the complainant -- Subsequently, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) directed a fact-finding enquiry, leading to police orders for further investigation without Magistrate's leave -- The Court emphasized that Section 173(8) of CrPC requires Magistrate's permission for further investigation after final report submission, and the police acted without jurisdiction in this case -- The pending criminal revision petition by the complainant was noted but did not affect the legal issue -- The judgment clarifies the procedural requirements under CrPC for further investigation post-final report

Issue of Consideration: Whether after submitting a final report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the police/investigating agency can conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of CrPC without obtaining the leave of the Magistrate/Court concerned

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the communication dated 06.06.2019 and order dated 26.04.2021, and held that further investigation under Section 173(8) of CrPC cannot be conducted without obtaining leave from the Magistrate after final report submission and acceptance

2026 LawText (SC) (02) 9

Criminal Appeal No. of 2026 (Arising Out of SLP (Criminal) No. 350 of 2024)

2026-02-04

RAJESH BINDAL J. , VIJAY BISHNOI J.

2026 INSC 120

Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr. Apoorva Agarwal, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent State

Pramod Kumar & Ors.

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Nature of Litigation: Criminal appeal challenging High Court order dismissing writ petition to quash police orders for further investigation

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought quashing of communication dated 06.06.2019 and order dated 26.04.2021 directing further investigation

Filing Reason

Appellants contended that further investigation under Section 173(8) of CrPC cannot be conducted without Magistrate's leave after final report acceptance

Previous Decisions

FIR registered in 2013, closure report submitted in 2014 and accepted by Magistrate in 2015, High Court dismissed writ petition in 2023, criminal revision petition pending before District and Sessions Judge

Issues

Whether police can conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of CrPC without Magistrate's leave after submitting final report under Section 173(2) of CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that further investigation requires Magistrate's permission post-final report Respondents likely defended police authority based on NHRC directions

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the police/investigating agency must obtain leave from the Magistrate/Court concerned to conduct further investigation after submitting a final report under Section 173(2); failure to do so renders such investigation without jurisdiction

Judgment Excerpts

The sole question arises for our consideration in the present appeal is whether after submitting a final report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') (also refer to Section 193(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS'), the police/investigating agency can conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of CrPC (also refer to Section 193(9) of BNSS) without obtaining the leave of the Magistrate/ Court concerned? The Court of First Additional Civil Judge, (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad, after considering the Closure Report, has accepted the same vide order dated 14.09.2015, noting that the material on record did not support the prosecution's case. In compliance thereof, the police issued orders for further investigation without Magistrate's leave.

Procedural History

FIR registered in 2013 -- Closure report submitted in 2014 and accepted by Magistrate in 2015 -- Criminal revision petition filed by complainant in 2017, pending -- NHRC directed fact-finding enquiry in 2019 -- Police issued communication in 2019 and order in 2021 for further investigation -- Appellants filed writ petition in High Court in 2022, dismissed in 2023 -- Supreme Court granted leave and heard appeal in 2026

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Further Investigation Order in Rape Case After Closure Rep...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Indian Penal Code...