High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Awards Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act -- Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction in Banking Dispute with Co-operative Bank -- No Conflict Found with SARFAESI Act or RDB Act

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court dismissed two Commercial Arbitration Petitions challenging arbitral awards passed by an Arbitrator appointed under Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 -- The Petitioners had defaulted on loan repayments to Abhyudaya Co-op Bank, leading to arbitration proceedings under MSCS Act and parallel SARFAESI Act proceedings -- The Petitioners challenged the Arbitrator's jurisdiction, arguing that banking debt recovery should be governed by RDB Act and SARFAESI Act as central legislation -- The Court rejected these arguments, holding that MSCS Act provides for statutory arbitration for disputes between members and co-operative societies, and there is no conflict with other banking legislation -- The Court emphasized the limited scope of Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and upheld the Arbitrator's findings on jurisdiction and maintainability of disputes

Headnote

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Commercial Arbitration Petitions filed under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging arbitral awards passed under Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 -- The Court held that the Arbitrator had jurisdiction to decide the disputes as the Petitioners were members of the Respondent Bank -- The Court found no conflict between Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 and The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) or The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (RDB Act) -- The Court emphasized the restrictive scope of Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and declined to interfere with factual findings of the Arbitrator

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of jurisdiction of Arbitrator under Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 in disputes involving recovery of banking debts and whether there is conflict with SARFAESI Act or RDB Act

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed both Commercial Arbitration Petitions and upheld the arbitral awards -- The Court held that the Arbitrator had jurisdiction under Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 as the Petitioners were members of the Respondent Bank -- The Court found no conflict between MSCS Act and SARFAESI Act or RDB Act -- The Court declined to interfere with factual findings of the Arbitrator given the restrictive scope of Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 49

Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 742 of 2025 with Interim Application No. 1785 of 2026, Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 200 of 2025 with Interim Application No. 478 of 2026, Interim Application No. 7412 of 2025

2026-02-12

Sharmila U. Deshmukh J.

2026:BHC-OS:4094

Mr. Mathews Nedumpara with Ms. Hemali Kurne and Mr. Dayanand for Petitioners, Mr. Madhur Rai with Sanjiv P., Mr. Durgesh Telang and Mr. Yogesh Mishra for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

A. Navinchandra Steel Private Limited, Shree Shantinath Steels, Nilaben Rajesh Soni

Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-op Bank Limited, The Authorized Officer of Abhyudaya Co-op Bank Ltd., V.N. Lothey (Patil) Arbitrator

Nature of Litigation: Commercial Arbitration Petitions challenging arbitral awards under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought setting aside of arbitral awards passed under Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002

Filing Reason

Petitioners challenged Arbitrator's jurisdiction in banking debt recovery dispute, arguing conflict with SARFAESI Act and RDB Act

Previous Decisions

Arbitrator passed awards dated 3rd July, 2023 and 5th December, 2022 finding Petitioners in default of loan repayments and upholding jurisdiction under MSCS Act

Issues

Whether the Arbitrator had jurisdiction under Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 to decide banking debt recovery disputes Whether there is conflict between Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 and SARFAESI Act or RDB Act regarding recovery of banking debts

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that banking debt recovery should be governed by RDB Act and SARFAESI Act as central legislation under Entry 45 of List I Petitioners contended that MSCS Act applies only to governance of co-operative societies, not debt recovery Respondents maintained that MSCS Act provides for statutory arbitration for disputes between members and co-operative societies

Ratio Decidendi

Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 provides for statutory arbitration under Section 84 for disputes between members and co-operative societies, which prevails over other legislation in such matters -- There is no conflict between MSCS Act and banking recovery legislation as they operate in different spheres -- Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has restrictive scope and courts should not interfere with factual findings of arbitrators

Judgment Excerpts

Both the Petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the Award passed by the learned Arbitrator appointed under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Considering that submissions canvassed were confined to legal submissions and did not assail the findings of fact and rightly so in view of the restrictive scope of Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 The MSCS Act prevails over the Sarfaesi Act and if the opponents are aggrieved against the measures adopted by the bank under Section 13 of the Sarfaesi Act, the provision of Section 17 of the Sarfaesi Act provides the remedy

Procedural History

Petitioners defaulted on loan repayments to Abhyudaya Co-op Bank -- Respondent Bank invoked Section 84 of MSCS Act and referred dispute to arbitration -- Arbitrator passed awards dated 3rd July, 2023 and 5th December, 2022 -- Petitioners filed Commercial Arbitration Petitions under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the awards -- Respondent Bank also initiated SARFAESI Act proceedings -- High Court heard common submissions and disposed of both petitions by common judgment

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Awards Under Multi-State ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reexamines the Right to Privacy of Adolescents: A Critical Review ...