NCLAT Dismisses Appeal as Time-Barred in Insolvency Matter Due to 244-Day Delay Without Sufficient Cause. Condonation of Delay Refused as Appellant Failed to Provide Adequate Explanation for the Delay in Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 35
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Principal Bench, New Delhi, heard an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appeal was filed by Evergreen Corporation against an order dated 24.01.2024 of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in CP (IB) No. 80/MB/2020. The appeal was accompanied by I.A. No. 8804 of 2024 seeking condonation of 244 days delay. The appellant later filed an additional affidavit on 18.03.2025 in support of the condonation application. The NCLAT heard both sides and perused the records. The appellant contended that the delay was due to various reasons, but the tribunal found the explanation insufficient. The NCLAT held that the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay and dismissed the application for condonation of delay, consequently dismissing the appeal as time-barred.

Headnote

A) Limitation - Condonation of Delay - Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Appeal filed with 244 days delay - Appellant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay - Held that delay cannot be condoned as the explanation was not satisfactory (Paras 2-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 244 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for condonation of delay (I.A. No. 8804 of 2024) is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024) is dismissed as time-barred.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Sufficient cause
  • Limitation
  • Section 61 IBC
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 4

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024

2025-03-18

Arun Baroka (Member Technical)

Mr. Sagar Ghogare, Mr. Suraj S. Ghogare (for Appellant); Mr. Nakul Mohta, Mr. Munaf Virjee, Mr. Rushabh Parekh, Mr. Ayush Kashyap (for Respondent)

Evergreen Corporation

M/s. Satec Envir Engineering (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against order of NCLT Mumbai Bench.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay of 244 days in filing the appeal.

Filing Reason

Appellant sought to challenge the impugned order dated 24.01.2024 but filed appeal with delay.

Previous Decisions

Impugned order dated 24.01.2024 passed by NCLT Mumbai Bench in CP (IB) No. 80/MB/2020.

Issues

Whether the delay of 244 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that delay was due to various reasons and filed additional affidavit in support. Respondent opposed condonation.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay of 244 days; hence, the delay cannot be condoned and the appeal is dismissed as time-barred.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an Appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Order dated 24th January, 2024 of the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. Before the Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024 is taken up, prayer for condonation of delay of 244 days, as filed in I.A. No. 8804 of 2024 is being addressed.

Procedural History

Impugned order dated 24.01.2024 passed by NCLT Mumbai Bench. Appeal filed with 244 days delay. I.A. No. 8804 of 2024 filed for condonation of delay. Additional affidavit filed on 18.03.2025. Heard both sides. Application dismissed, appeal dismissed as time-barred.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 61
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Dismisses Appeal as Time-Barred in Insolvency Matter Due to 244-Day Delay Without Sufficient Cause. Condonation of Delay Refused as Appellant Failed to Provide Adequate Explanation for the Delay in Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of Insolvency a...
Related Judgement
High Court Court Quashes FIR in Sexual Harassment Case Based on ICC Findings. FIR Quashed Due to Unsubstantiated Allegations and Improbable Offences