NCLAT Sets Aside Direction for Inspection of Liquidator's Conduct for Violation of Natural Justice. Adverse remarks and inspection order quashed as liquidator was not given opportunity of hearing under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI In Favour of Accused
  • 47
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, CA Ramasamy Shanmuggam, the liquidator of RLS Alloys Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 02.06.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) in IA No.796/2021. The challenge was limited to para 30(vii) of the order, which directed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records pertaining to the corporate debtor to find irregularities. The appellant contended that this direction was passed without any opportunity of hearing being provided to him, violating principles of natural justice. The NCLAT examined the issue and found that the Adjudicating Authority had made adverse remarks and directed an inspection without giving the liquidator a chance to explain. The Appellate Tribunal held that such a direction, which could lead to serious consequences for the liquidator, could not be sustained without affording an opportunity of hearing. Accordingly, the NCLAT set aside the observation in para 30(vii) of the Impugned Order and allowed the appeal to that extent.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 196 - The Adjudicating Authority directed IBBI to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records without providing any opportunity of hearing to the liquidator. The Appellate Tribunal held that such a direction, which could lead to adverse consequences, cannot be passed without affording the liquidator a chance to explain or defend himself. The observation in para 30(vii) of the Impugned Order was set aside. (Paras 1-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Adjudicating Authority could direct IBBI to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records without affording an opportunity of hearing to the liquidator.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT allowed the appeal to the extent of setting aside the observation made in para 30(vii) of the Impugned Order dated 02.06.2022, which directed IBBI to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Opportunity of Hearing
  • Adverse Remarks
  • Liquidator's Conduct
  • Inspection Direction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 21

Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.413/2022

2024-11-20

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial)

Mr. A.G. Sathyanarayana, Advocate for Appellant; Mr. K. S. Jeyaganeshan, Senior Panel Advocate for Respondent

CA Ramasamy Shanmuggam, Liquidator of RLS Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) directing IBBI to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records.

Remedy Sought

The appellant liquidator sought to set aside the observation in para 30(vii) of the Impugned Order directing inspection of his conduct and records.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the direction was passed without affording him an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Impugned Order dated 02.06.2022 was passed by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority in IA No.796/2021, in CP /661(IB)/CB/2017.

Issues

Whether the Adjudicating Authority could direct IBBI to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records without affording an opportunity of hearing to the liquidator.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that no opportunity of explaining or defending himself was provided before the adverse remarks and direction for inspection were made. The respondent IBBI's position is not detailed in the judgment text.

Ratio Decidendi

A direction for inspection of a liquidator's conduct and records, which could lead to adverse consequences, cannot be passed without affording the liquidator an opportunity of hearing, as it violates principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant contends that the said observation made in para. 30(vii) is wrong with eyes of law for the reason being that, prior to passing of the order, no opportunity of explaining or defending himself was provided. As far as, the observation... The Appellant who is the Official Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor M/s RLS Alloys Pvt. Ltd, puts a challenge to the Impugned Order dated 02.06.2022...

Procedural History

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) passed an order on 02.06.2022 in IA No.796/2021 in CP /661(IB)/CB/2017, which included a direction in para 30(vii) for IBBI to conduct a detailed inspection of the liquidator's conduct and records. The liquidator appealed to NCLAT against that specific observation.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 196
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Hindu Religious Endowment Dispute — 'Bakers Choultry' Held as Specific Endowment Under Tamil Nadu HR&CE Act. Rock Inscription Providing for Feeding Brahmins During Festivals Constitutes Religious Charity, Not Priva...
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Sets Aside Direction for Inspection of Liquidator's Conduct for Violation of Natural Justice. Adverse remarks and inspection order quashed as liquidator was not given opportunity of hearing under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.