NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeals Against CIRP Initiation by State Bank of India for Non-Payment of Loan Guarantee. Personal Guarantors' Appeals Dismissed as Withdrawn, Upholding Adjudicating Authority's Order Admitting Section 95 Application Under IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai bench heard four connected appeals filed by personal guarantors—Ajay Agarwal, Ashok Agarwal, Ankit Agarwal, and Anitha Agarwal—against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai) admitting a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) filed by State Bank of India (SBI). The SBI had initiated corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor, and subsequently filed Section 95 applications against the personal guarantors. The Adjudicating Authority admitted the Section 95 application, appointing T.R. Ravichandran as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Aggrieved, the personal guarantors filed these appeals. During the hearing before NCLAT, the learned Senior Advocate for the appellants, Mr. P.S. Raman, submitted that the appellants wished to withdraw the appeals. The Tribunal noted the submission and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn. The Tribunal did not grant any liberty to file fresh appeals. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Member (Judicial)) and Mr. N. Venkataraman (Member (Technical)). The order was pronounced on 17.03.2025.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Personal Guarantor - Withdrawal of Appeal - Section 95, IBC - The appellants, personal guarantors, sought to withdraw their appeals against the order admitting the Section 95 application filed by State Bank of India. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, noting that no liberty was sought to file a fresh appeal. (Paras 1-13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeals against the order admitting Section 95 application under IBC should be allowed or dismissed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. All pending IAs are closed.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • dismissal as withdrawn
  • no liberty to file fresh appeal
  • Section 95 IBC
  • personal guarantor
  • CIRP initiation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 82

Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) Nos.291,292,293 & 294/2025

2025-03-17

Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Member (Judicial)), Mr. N. Venkataraman (Member (Technical))

Mr. P.S. Raman, Senior Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Bohra, Advocate

Ajay Agarwal, Ashok Agarwal, Ankit Agarwal, Anitha Agarwal

State Bank of India, T.R. Ravichandran (Interim Resolution Professional)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against order admitting Section 95 application under IBC for initiation of CIRP against personal guarantors.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the order of the Adjudicating Authority admitting the Section 95 application filed by State Bank of India.

Filing Reason

The Adjudicating Authority admitted the Section 95 application filed by State Bank of India against the personal guarantors, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Chennai) admitted the Section 95 application filed by State Bank of India against the personal guarantors.

Issues

Whether the appeals should be allowed or dismissed as withdrawn.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned Senior Advocate for the appellants submitted that the appellants wished to withdraw the appeals.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals and dismissed them as withdrawn, as no liberty was sought to file a fresh appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Senior Advocate for the appellants submitted that the appellants wish to withdraw the appeals. In view of the said submission, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Chennai) admitted the Section 95 application filed by State Bank of India against the personal guarantors. Aggrieved, the personal guarantors filed these appeals before NCLAT Chennai. During hearing, the appellants sought to withdraw the appeals, which was allowed, and the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 95
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeals Against CIRP Initiation by State Bank of India for Non-Payment of Loan Guarantee. Personal Guarantors' Appeals Dismissed as Withdrawn, Upholding Adjudicating Authority's Order Admitting Section 95 Application Under IBC...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 198...