NCLAT Allows Settlement in IBC Section 9 Case, Keeps Admission Order in Abeyance. Appellant directed to deposit Rs. 1 crore with CoC and file Section 12A application within three weeks.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 34
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Vyanka Tesh Kulkarni, the suspended director of Manas Vyapar Pvt. Ltd., against an order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) admitting a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) filed by Kataria Infrastructure Corporation & Anr. and initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. The appellant submitted that the only claim made by the respondent was Rs. 1 crore and expressed willingness to pay that amount without prejudice to its rights. The appellant had already brought a Demand Draft of Rs. 1 crore. The respondent's counsel suggested that the appellant should put a proposal before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and then file an application under Section 12A of the IBC, and also be ready to pay CIRP costs as directed by the impugned order. The appellant's counsel sought instructions and indicated inclination to deposit the money with the CoC and file a Section 12A application. The Tribunal granted three weeks' time to do the needful and kept the impugned order in abeyance until the next date of hearing. The matter was listed for 06.02.2025. The appellant had already e-filed an additional affidavit, which was directed to be filed in hard copy and placed on record with a copy to the respondent.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Section 9 Admission - Settlement - The appeal challenged the admission of a Section 9 petition and initiation of CIRP against the corporate debtor. The appellant offered to pay the claimed amount of Rs. 1 crore and sought time to file a Section 12A application. The Tribunal kept the impugned order in abeyance for three weeks to allow the appellant to deposit the amount with the CoC and file the application. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order admitting the Section 9 petition and initiating CIRP should be stayed to allow the appellant to settle the claim and file an application under Section 12A of the IBC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order is kept in abeyance for three weeks to allow the appellant to deposit Rs. 1 crore with the CoC and file an application under Section 12A of the IBC. List on 06.02.2025.

Law Points

  • Settlement under Section 12A of IBC
  • Withdrawal of CIRP upon settlement
  • Interim stay of CIRP pending settlement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 104

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 2045 of 2024

2024-12-20

Mr. Deepak Biswas (for Appellant), Aakashi Lodha and Mr. G. Anirudh Purushottam (for Respondent-1)

Vyanka Tesh Kulkarni

Kataria Infrastructure Corporation & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against admission of Section 9 petition and initiation of CIRP

Remedy Sought

Stay of impugned order to allow settlement and filing of Section 12A application

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the order admitting Section 9 petition and initiating CIRP

Previous Decisions

Impugned order dated 29.10.2024 admitting Section 9 petition and initiating CIRP

Issues

Whether the impugned order should be stayed to allow settlement under Section 12A IBC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant offered to pay Rs. 1 crore and sought time to file Section 12A application Respondent suggested proposal before CoC and payment of CIRP costs

Ratio Decidendi

Where the appellant expresses willingness to settle the claim and file an application under Section 12A IBC, the admission order may be kept in abeyance to facilitate settlement.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Counsel for Appellant submits the petition u/s 9 of IBC was admitted against Appellant herein vide impugned order and the CIRP was initiated. In the meanwhile, impugned order shall be kept in abeyance till the next date of hearing in view of the submissions made by ld. Counsel for Appellant.

Procedural History

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) passed an order on 29.10.2024 admitting a Section 9 petition and initiating CIRP against the corporate debtor. The appellant filed this appeal on 20.12.2024. The NCLAT heard the matter on the same day and passed the interim order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 9, 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Allows Settlement in IBC Section 9 Case, Keeps Admission Order in Abeyance. Appellant directed to deposit Rs. 1 crore with CoC and file Section 12A application within three weeks.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officers in SARFAESI Act Loan Recovery Dispute. Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC.