NCLAT Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal Against Contribution Order in IBC Liquidation — Secured Creditor Realizing Security Under Section 52 Not Liable to Contribute to Workmen's Dues or Liquidation Costs. The court held that the waterfall mechanism under Section 53 IBC does not apply to secured creditors who opt out of the liquidation process, and Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013 is inapplicable.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI In Favour of Accused
  • 42
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Cosmos Co-Operative Bank Ltd., a secured creditor of Pandit Automotive Pvt. Ltd. (corporate debtor), challenging an order of the NCLT Mumbai dated 14.11.2024. The corporate debtor had mortgaged its immovable property with the appellant as a guarantor for two borrower companies. The appellant issued notices under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and took symbolic possession on 18.10.2017. Subsequently, CIRP was initiated against the corporate debtor on an application by Reliance Commercial Finance Limited under Section 7 of IBC, and liquidation commenced. The appellant realized its security interest under Section 52 of IBC and sold the property. The liquidator filed I.A. No.4873/2023 seeking a direction to the appellant to contribute towards workmen's dues and liquidation costs. The NCLT allowed the application, directing the appellant to contribute proportionately towards workmen's dues under Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013 and towards liquidation costs under Section 52(8) of IBC. The appellant appealed to NCLAT. The NCLAT held that Section 52 of IBC does not impose any obligation on a secured creditor who realizes its security outside liquidation to contribute to liquidation costs or workmen's dues. The waterfall mechanism under Section 53 applies only to the liquidator's distribution of assets, not to amounts realized by secured creditors outside liquidation. Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013 is not applicable to liquidation under IBC. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Secured Creditor's Rights - Section 52 IBC - Contribution to Liquidation Costs - A secured creditor who opts to realize its security interest outside the liquidation process under Section 52 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not required to contribute towards workmen's dues or liquidation costs. The adjudicating authority's direction to contribute under Section 226(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Section 52(8) of IBC was set aside. Held that the waterfall mechanism under Section 53 does not apply to such secured creditors, and the liquidator cannot demand contribution from the amount realized by the secured creditor (Paras 1-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a secured creditor who realizes its security interest under Section 52 of the IBC, 2016 outside the liquidation process is liable to contribute towards workmen's dues and liquidation costs as directed by the adjudicating authority.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 14.11.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Mumbai Bench, Court – II) in I.A. No.4873/2023 is set aside. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 52 of IBC
  • 2016 does not require a secured creditor who realizes its security outside liquidation to contribute to liquidation costs or workmen's dues
  • Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act
  • 2013 is not applicable to liquidation under IBC
  • The waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of IBC is not triggered when secured creditor opts out of liquidation process.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 107

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 67 of 2025

2025-01-14

Ashok Bhushan

Mr. Ramchandra Madan, Mr. Tushar Nigam (for Appellant); Mr. Avinash R. Khanolkar, Ms. Surekha Yadav, Ms. Khushbu Bhanushali, Mr. V. Deshpande (for Respondents)

Cosmos Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

CS Anaghaanasingaraju, Liquidator for Pandit Automotive Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of NCLT directing secured creditor to contribute towards workmen's dues and liquidation costs.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside the impugned order dated 14.11.2024 passed by NCLT Mumbai.

Filing Reason

The appellant, a secured creditor, was directed by NCLT to contribute out of the amount realized under Section 52 of IBC towards workmen's dues and liquidation costs.

Previous Decisions

NCLT Mumbai allowed I.A. No.4873/2023 filed by the liquidator, directing the appellant to contribute proportionately towards workmen's dues under Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013 and towards liquidation costs under Section 52(8) of IBC.

Issues

Whether a secured creditor who realizes its security interest under Section 52 of IBC outside liquidation is liable to contribute towards workmen's dues and liquidation costs. Whether Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013 applies to liquidation under IBC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that Section 52 of IBC does not impose any obligation to contribute to liquidation costs or workmen's dues; the waterfall mechanism under Section 53 does not apply to secured creditors who opt out. Respondent liquidator argued that the secured creditor must contribute proportionately towards workmen's dues and liquidation costs as per the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi

A secured creditor who realizes its security interest under Section 52 of the IBC, 2016 outside the liquidation process is not required to contribute towards workmen's dues or liquidation costs. The waterfall mechanism under Section 53 applies only to the liquidator's distribution of assets, not to amounts realized by secured creditors outside liquidation. Section 226(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 is not applicable to liquidation under the IBC.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal by a secured creditor of the corporate debtor M/s. Pandit Automotive Private Ltd. has been filed challenging the order dated 14.11.2024 passed by the adjudicating authority... By the impugned order, adjudicating authority has directed the appellant to make a contribution out of the amount realised by it under Section 52 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, proportionately towards workmen’s dues... The appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 14.11.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority... is set aside.

Procedural History

The corporate debtor mortgaged property with appellant. Appellant issued notice under SARFAESI Act and took symbolic possession on 18.10.2017. CIRP initiated on application by Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. under Section 7 IBC. Liquidation commenced. Appellant realized security under Section 52 IBC. Liquidator filed I.A. No.4873/2023 seeking contribution. NCLT allowed the application on 14.11.2024. Appellant filed appeal before NCLAT on 14.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 52, Section 52(8), Section 53, Section 7
  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: Section 13(2), Section 13(4)
  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 226(1)(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal Against Contribution Order in IBC Liquidation — Secured Creditor Realizing Security Under Section 52 Not Liable to Contribute to Workmen's Dues or Liquidation Costs. The court held that the waterfall mechanism...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order to Issue Relieving Letter to Employee Who Breached Bond. Employee's Right to Service Certificate Held Not Conditional on Completion of Bond Period Under Maharashtra ...