NCLAT Issues Notice in Appeal Against Rejection of Resolution Plan Approved by 100% CoC Vote. The Tribunal stays liquidation pending hearing, noting that the Resolution Professional and CoC also intend to challenge the same order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 43
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) heard an appeal filed by Deepvir Enterprises & Anr. against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (likely NCLT) that rejected a Resolution Plan submitted by the appellants. The plan had been approved by 100% of the voting share of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The appellant, represented by Senior Advocate Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, argued that the rejection was erroneous. The Resolution Professional (Respondent No.1) and the CoC (Respondent Nos.2 and 3) also indicated their intention to file an appeal against the same impugned order. They submitted that no reply was necessary and sought permission to file short notes of submission. The NCLAT issued notice to Respondent No.4 and listed the appeal for hearing on 22.07.2025. In the meantime, the Tribunal directed that the Liquidator shall not take any further steps in pursuance of an earlier order dated 23.06.2025, effectively staying the liquidation process pending the appeal.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Resolution Plan - Rejection by Adjudicating Authority - Appeal - The Adjudicating Authority rejected a Resolution Plan approved by 100% voting share of the CoC. The appellant, along with the Resolution Professional and CoC, challenged the order. NCLAT issued notice and directed the Liquidator not to take further steps pending appeal. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Adjudicating Authority erred in rejecting a Resolution Plan approved by 100% voting share of the Committee of Creditors (CoC).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

NCLAT issued notice to Respondent No.4, listed the appeal for 22.07.2025, and directed that the Liquidator shall not take any further steps in pursuance of the order dated 23.06.2025.

Law Points

  • Resolution Plan
  • CoC approval
  • Adjudicating Authority rejection
  • appeal
  • interim stay on liquidation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 129

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 946 of 2025

2025-07-04

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice N Seshasayee, Arun Baroka

Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raheel Patel, Mr. Himanshu Satija, Mr. Harsh Saxena, Ms. Ridhi Ranjan (for Appellant); Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Ms. Sujal Gupta, Mr. Harsh Gurbani (for R-1); Mr. Niraj Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Mr. Nimish Gupta, Mr. Piyush Bhardwaj, Mr. Shivam Sengupta (for R-2 & 3)

Deepvir Enterprises & Anr.

Nimai Gautam Shah, RP of Zep Infratech Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against rejection of Resolution Plan by Adjudicating Authority

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the impugned order rejecting the Resolution Plan and interim stay on liquidation

Filing Reason

The Adjudicating Authority rejected the Resolution Plan submitted by the appellant, which was approved by 100% voting share of the CoC.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority passed an order rejecting the Resolution Plan; also an order dated 23.06.2025 directing liquidation steps.

Issues

Whether the Adjudicating Authority erred in rejecting a Resolution Plan approved by 100% voting share of the CoC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: The Adjudicating Authority wrongly rejected the Resolution Plan which was approved by 100% CoC vote. Respondents (RP and CoC): They also intend to file an appeal against the same impugned order and seek to file short notes.

Ratio Decidendi

Pending hearing, the court granted interim stay on liquidation to protect the subject matter of the appeal, noting that the Resolution Plan had 100% CoC approval and the RP and CoC also intended to challenge the rejection.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order has rejected the Resolution Plan submitted by the Appellant which was approved by the 100% voting share of the CoC. In the mean time, in pursuance of the order dated 23.06.2025 the Liquidator shall not take any further steps.

Procedural History

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) rejected the Resolution Plan. The appellant filed an appeal before NCLAT on 04.07.2025. The NCLAT issued notice and granted interim stay on liquidation.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Allows Appeal Against NCLT Order Rejecting Resolution Professional's Fee Claim, Directs Reconsideration on Merits. The NCLAT held that the NCLT's order was in violation of natural justice as the RP was not heard before the order was passed, and...
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Issues Notice in Appeal Against Rejection of Resolution Plan Approved by 100% CoC Vote. The Tribunal stays liquidation pending hearing, noting that the Resolution Professional and CoC also intend to challenge the same order.