Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Appellants -- Upholds Committee of Creditors' Approval of Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited's Resolution Plan Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 -- Doctrine of Commercial Wisdom Affirmed in Insolvency Resolution

  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court upheld the approval of a Resolution Plan by Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited (SEML) for SKS Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Ltd. under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), dismissing appeals by Appellants -- The Court affirmed the doctrine of commercial wisdom, stating that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) has primary authority in insolvency resolution, and judicial bodies should not interfere with commercial decisions -- The CoC conducted an inter-se bidding process, sought clarifications, and approved SEML's plan with unanimous voting -- The NCLT initially remitted the plan for reconsideration but later approved it after the NCLAT set aside the remittance order due to procedural lapses -- The Supreme Court held that the CoC's decision was based on commercial wisdom, and the adjudicating authority's role is limited to ensuring compliance and fairness -- All appeals were dismissed, confirming the lower tribunals' orders

Headnote

The Supreme Court dismissed civil appeals filed by unsuccessful resolution applicants -- against the approval of a Resolution Plan by Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited (SEML) for SKS Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Ltd. under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) -- The Court emphasized the doctrine of commercial wisdom, holding that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) has decisive authority in insolvency resolution, and courts should not substitute their assessment for that of the CoC -- The adjudicating authority's role is supervisory, ensuring statutory compliance and procedural fairness without second-guessing economic decisions -- The CoC approved SEML's plan with a 100% vote share after an inter-se bidding process and clarifications -- The NCLT and NCLAT orders were affirmed, rejecting applications for fresh consideration by other applicants -- The judgment reinforces the IBC's shift from a court-centric to a creditor-driven process, prioritizing efficiency and market responsiveness

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) erred in approving the Resolution Plan of Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited (SEML) and rejecting the applications of other resolution applicants, particularly regarding the CoC's commercial wisdom and procedural fairness under the IBC

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed all civil appeals, upholding the NCLAT and NCLT orders that approved SEML's Resolution Plan and rejected the applications of other resolution applicants

2026 LawText (SC) (02) 75

Civil Appeal Nos.11746-11747 of 2024, Civil Appeal Nos.11689-11690 of 2024, Civil Appeal Nos.12994-12995 of 2024

2026-02-27

B. V. NAGARATHNA J. , R. MAHADEVAN J.

2026 INSC 206

Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Kapil Sibal,

Torrent Power Ltd., Vantage Point Asset Management Pte. Ltd., Jindal Power Ltd.

Ashish Arjunkumar Rathi & Others, including Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited

Nature of Litigation: Civil appeals challenging the approval of a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought reversal of NCLAT and NCLT orders approving SEML's Resolution Plan and rejection of their applications for fresh consideration

Filing Reason

Appellants were unsuccessful resolution applicants aggrieved by the dismissal of their appeals and approval of SEML's plan

Previous Decisions

NCLT initially remitted the plan for reconsideration but later approved it after NCLAT set aside the remittance order; NCLAT dismissed appeals affirming NCLT's approval

Issues

Whether the CoC's approval of SEML's Resolution Plan was valid under the doctrine of commercial wisdom Whether the adjudicating authority erred in its supervisory role under the IBC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued for fresh consideration of their plans Respondents defended the CoC's decision based on commercial wisdom

Ratio Decidendi

The doctrine of commercial wisdom under the IBC vests decisive authority in the Committee of Creditors for insolvency resolution -- Courts should not substitute their assessment for that of the CoC, limiting their role to ensuring statutory compliance and procedural fairness -- The CoC's decision, based on commercial evaluation, is paramount in the creditor-driven process

Judgment Excerpts

The IBC recognises that decisions on viability, valuation, and acceptable haircuts are inherently commercial, not judicial Courts, therefore, do not substitute their assessment for that of the CoC The doctrine of commercial wisdom thus embodies both institutional discipline and legislative intent

Procedural History

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated under Section 7 of IBC -- CoC conducted inter-se bidding and approved SEML's plan -- NCLT initially remitted plan for reconsideration but later approved it after NCLAT set aside remittance order -- NCLAT dismissed appeals -- Supreme Court heard civil appeals under Section 62 of IBC and dismissed them

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Appellants -- Upholds Committee of Creditors'...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds Expulsion of Law Student: A Complex Case of Repeated Miscondu...