Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Condonation of Delay Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 774 days not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay with cogent evidence.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Special Land Acquisition Officer and another applicant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 774 days delay in filing a First Appeal against the judgment and award dated 07.01.2023 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur in L.A.R. Case No.231 of 2012 and connected cases. The applicants, represented by learned AGP Ms. Bhumi Gandhi, argued that the delay occurred due to administrative procedures: obtaining certified copy (applied on 10.01.2023, received on 01.03.2023), receiving Law Officers Rules Report on 30.06.2023, seeking opinion from Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited on 06.07.2023, and sending reminders. The court noted that the application merely reproduced the averments without providing specific dates or reasons for the entire delay. The court held that the explanation was vague and did not constitute 'sufficient cause' under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court emphasized that each day's delay must be explained, and the state cannot claim special treatment. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the delay was not condoned.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act - Condonation of Delay - Section 5 - Sufficient Cause - The applicant sought condonation of 774 days delay in filing appeal against land acquisition award - The court held that the explanation for delay was vague and lacked sufficient cause - The state failed to explain each day's delay with cogent evidence - Application dismissed (Paras 1-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 774 days in filing the First Appeal against the judgment and award dated 07.01.2023 should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is dismissed. The delay of 774 days is not condoned.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Sufficient cause
  • Each day's delay must be explained
  • Limitation Act Section 5
  • Government cannot claim special treatment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:4847

R/Civil Application (For Condonation of Delay) No. 3768 of 2025 in F/First Appeal/22076/2025 with R/Civil Application No. 3798 of 2025 in F/First Appeal No. 22074 of 2025

2026-01-16

M. K. Thakker

2026:GUJHC:4847

Ms. Bhumi Gandhi, AGP for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2; Unserved Expired (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

The Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.

Javanji Babaji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil application for condonation of delay in filing first appeal against land acquisition award.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of 774 days delay in filing First Appeal.

Filing Reason

Delay in filing appeal due to administrative procedures.

Previous Decisions

Judgment and award dated 07.01.2023 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur in L.A.R. Case No.231 of 2012 and connected cases.

Issues

Whether the delay of 774 days in filing the First Appeal should be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant submitted that the delay occurred due to administrative procedures: obtaining certified copy, receiving Law Officers Rules Report, seeking opinion from Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited, and sending reminders.

Ratio Decidendi

The explanation for delay was vague and did not constitute 'sufficient cause' under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Each day's delay must be explained, and the state cannot claim special treatment.

Judgment Excerpts

Since the issues raised in these applications are similar, they are being decided by a common judgment. The present application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 774 days in filing the First Appeal challenging the judgment and award dated 07.01.2023 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur in L.A.R Case No.231 of 2012 and L.A.R Case No.232 of 2012 to L.A.R Case No.235 of 2012.

Procedural History

The judgment and award was passed on 07.01.2023. The applicant applied for certified copy on 10.01.2023 and received it on 01.03.2023. On 30.06.2023, the Law Officers Rules Report was received. On 06.07.2023, a letter was sent for opinion from Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited. On 07.07.2023, the opinion was received. A reminder was sent on 13.09.2023. The present application was filed in 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Gold Smuggling — High Court's Quashing Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind Regarding Bail Likelihood. The Court held that the detaining authority must record satisfaction of imm...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Condonation of Delay Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 774 days not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay with cogent evidence.