Bombay High Court Revises Mesne Profits and Interest in Dispute Between Forbes Gokak Ltd. and BPCL. Court fixes quantum of mesne profits while reducing interest rate in long-standing tenancy dispute.

Sub Category: Bombay High Court
  • 53
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute between M/s. Forbes Gokak Ltd. (landlord) and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) (tenant) regarding mesne profits and interest after a Small Causes Court ruling. The case involves cross Civil Revision Applications filed by both parties following the Appellate Court’s decision. BPCL sought a reduction in the mesne profits and interest, while Forbes Gokak sought an increase.

Core Issue: A dispute over the quantum of mesne profits payable by BPCL for occupying premises after termination of tenancy and the interest applicable on these amounts. Proceedings: Trial Court: Directed BPCL to pay mesne profits for occupying the suit premises post-termination from 2001 to 2013. Appellate Court: Confirmed the Trial Court’s decision on mesne profits but kept the interest rate unchanged. Cross Civil Revision Applications: Filed by BPCL and Forbes Gokak before the Bombay High Court to challenge the Appellate Court's decision. Key Judgments: Mesne Profits: The Small Causes Court fixed mesne profits for the period from 2001 to 2013, totaling Rs. 4,90,50,000, with rates increasing every three years. Interest: The court originally awarded a 9% interest rate. BPCL argued for a lower rate, while Forbes Gokak sought 18%. Court’s Decision: The quantum of mesne profits remains unaltered. The interest rate was reduced from 9% to 6%, as the court ruled the transaction was not commercial in nature. Interest adjustments were ordered for amounts already deposited by BPCL during the litigation period. Acts and Sections Discussed: Order 20, Rule 12(1)(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Relating to the assessment of mesne profits. Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Governing the awarding of interest on money decrees, which limits interest to 6% unless the liability arises out of a commercial transaction. Ratio Decidendi: The court's rationale for reducing the interest rate hinged on the non-commercial nature of BPCL’s transaction, as renting a guest house was not part of its core business activity. This brought the interest rate under Section 34 to 6%. Subjects:

Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Mesne Profits, Interest Rate calculation, Civil Revision Application, Section 34 of CPC.

Issue of Consideration: M/s. Forbes Gokak Ltd & Anr. Versus Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

2024 LawText (BOM) (9) 106

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.424 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.1604 OF 2024

2024-09-10

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

Mr. G.S. Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b Ms. Pooja Thakkar for Applicants in CRA 424 of 2024 and for Respondents in CRA (Stamp) No.1604 of 2024. Mr. Pankaj Sawant, Senior Advocate with Mr. Roop Basu, Mr. Ahmed Padela i/b The Law Point for Applicant in CRA (Stamp) No.1604 of 2024 and for Respondents in CRA 424 of 2024.

M/s. Forbes Gokak Ltd & Anr.

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Addresses Dispute Over Redevelopment Rights in Alphonso D'Souza Case....
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Revises Mesne Profits and Interest in Dispute Between Forbes G...