High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence of Claimant Not a Bar to Claim Under No-Fault Liability. The court held that Section 163-A is a no-fault provision and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on grounds of contributory negligence.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused

Admin

2026-05-19 02:42:09

Font size:

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Shashikant Manubhai Bhatti (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.6,00,000 for injuries sustained in a vehicular accident on 10.07.2007. The claimant was riding a scooter when a donkey suddenly came on the road and dashed against the scooter, causing it to slip and resulting in serious injuries. The claim petition was dismissed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) in M.A.C.P. No. 1019 of 2007 vide judgment and award dated 12.06.2012, on the ground that the claimant himself was negligent in causing the accident. The Insurance Company (opponent no.2) filed a written statement denying the claim. The claimant examined himself and three doctors to prove his case. The High Court of Gujarat, in the appeal, held that Section 163-A is a no-fault liability provision and the negligence of the claimant is irrelevant. The court set aside the Tribunal's award and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh computation of compensation in accordance with the structured formula under the Second Schedule of the Act. The court directed the Tribunal to decide the matter afresh within six months from the date of receipt of the order.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - No-Fault Liability - Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Negligence of Claimant - The claim under Section 163-A is based on the principle of no-fault liability and the negligence of the claimant is not a relevant factor for determining entitlement to compensation under this provision. The Tribunal erred in dismissing the petition on the ground of contributory negligence. (Paras 1, 5-7)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Structured Formula - Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The compensation under Section 163-A is to be determined as per the structured formula given in the Second Schedule, irrespective of the fault of the claimant. The court directed the Tribunal to compute compensation afresh in accordance with law. (Paras 6-8)

Issue of Consideration

Whether the learned Tribunal was justified in dismissing the claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on the ground that the claimant himself was negligent in causing the accident.

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and award dated 12.06.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) in M.A.C.P. No. 1019 of 2007 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the learned Tribunal for fresh consideration and computation of compensation in accordance with the structured formula under the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal is directed to decide the matter afresh within six months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act
1988 is a no-fault liability provision
negligence of claimant is irrelevant
structured formula compensation
strict liability

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:2626

R/First Appeal No. 582 of 2013

2026-01-12

Mool Chand Tyagi

2026:GUJHC:2626

Mr. Hiren M Modi for the appellants, Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati for the defendant no.2

Sashikant Manubhai Bhatti (Deceased) & Ors.

Minaben Prakashbhai Bhatti & Anr.

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against dismissal of motor accident claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought compensation of Rs.6,00,000 for injuries sustained in a vehicular accident.

Filing Reason

The claim petition was dismissed by the Tribunal on the ground that the claimant himself was negligent.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) dismissed M.A.C.P. No. 1019 of 2007 on 12.06.2012.

Issues

Whether the claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 can be dismissed on the ground of negligence of the claimant?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that Section 163-A is a no-fault liability provision and negligence is irrelevant. The Insurance Company opposed the claim, denying the contents of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is a no-fault liability provision and the negligence of the claimant is not a relevant factor for determining entitlement to compensation under this provision. The Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground of contributory negligence.

Judgment Excerpts

The captioned appeal is preferred against the impugned judgment and award dated 12.06.2012 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) in M.A.C.P. No. 1019 of 2007, whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed the petition on the ground that the claimant himself was negligent in causing the accident. Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 is a no-fault liability provision and the negligence of the claimant is not a relevant factor for determining entitlement to compensation under this provision.

Procedural History

The original claimant filed M.A.C.P. No. 1019 of 2007 under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural). The Tribunal dismissed the petition on 12.06.2012. Aggrieved, the claimant (since deceased, through legal heirs) filed the present First Appeal No. 582 of 2013 before the High Court of Gujarat.