High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Loss of Uterus and Fetus in Motor Accident Claim. The Court held that the Tribunal's award of Rs. 2,50,000/- was inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 10,00,000/- considering the permanent disability and loss of reproductive capacity.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Makuben Haribhai Bharvad, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a motor accident on 23.12.2006. She was walking with others from Bapa-Sitaram temple to Jalaram Bapa temple when a TATA tempo (GJ-10-V-3422) driven rashly by respondent No.1 turned turtle on the group, causing grievous injuries. She suffered fracture of pubic rami, rupture of uterus, and loss of her fetus. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,50,000/- with 9% interest. Dissatisfied, she appealed. The High Court considered the severity of injuries, including permanent loss of reproductive capacity, and held that the compensation was inadequate. The Court enhanced the award to Rs. 10,00,000/- under various heads: Rs. 2,00,000/- for pain, shock and suffering; Rs. 2,00,000/- for loss of amenities; Rs. 1,00,000/- for future medical expenses; Rs. 2,00,000/- for loss of fetus; Rs. 2,00,000/- for loss of uterus; and Rs. 1,00,000/- for actual medical expenses. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Loss of Uterus and Fetus - Assessment of Damages - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 - The appellant, a pregnant woman, suffered grievous injuries in a vehicular accident resulting in loss of her fetus and uterus. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,50,000/-. On appeal, the High Court enhanced compensation to Rs. 10,00,000/- considering the permanent disability, loss of reproductive capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of amenities. Held that compensation must be just and reasonable, taking into account the severity of injuries and their impact on the victim's life. (Paras 1-8)

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Pain, Shock and Suffering - Loss of Amenities - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 - The Court awarded Rs. 2,00,000/- for pain, shock and suffering, Rs. 2,00,000/- for loss of amenities of life, and Rs. 1,00,000/- for future medical expenses, in addition to other heads. Held that the victim's loss of uterus and child constitutes a grave injury warranting substantial compensation. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for loss of uterus and fetus, and other injuries, is just and proper?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The compensation is enhanced from Rs. 2,50,000/- to Rs. 10,00,000/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization. The enhanced amount shall be deposited by the Insurance Company within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Compensation for loss of uterus
  • Compensation for loss of fetus
  • Pain and shock and suffering
  • Loss of amenities of life
  • Future medical expenses
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 Section 166
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 431

R/First Appeal No. 3724 of 2014

2026-01-29

Mool Chand Tyagi

MR MTM HAKIM for Appellant, MR KV GADHIA for Respondent No.3

Makuben Haribhai Bharvad

Rameshbhai Naranbhai Tadvi & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation for injuries sustained in motor accident

Filing Reason

Inadequacy of compensation awarded by Tribunal

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,50,000/- with 9% interest on 03.06.2014 in M.A.C.P. No. 410 of 2007

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper? What should be the appropriate compensation for loss of uterus and fetus?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the compensation is inadequate considering the grievous injuries, loss of fetus, and loss of uterus. Respondent No.3 (Insurance Company) argued that the award is just and proper.

Ratio Decidendi

Compensation for loss of uterus and fetus must be substantial, considering the permanent disability, loss of reproductive capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of amenities. The Tribunal's award was inadequate and enhanced to Rs. 10,00,000/-.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant sustained grievous injuries, which caused loss of her fetus and also loss of her uterus. The compensation must be just and reasonable, taking into account the severity of injuries and their impact on the victim's life.

Procedural History

Claim Petition M.A.C.P. No. 410 of 2007 filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Vadodara, which partly allowed the petition on 03.06.2014 awarding Rs. 2,50,000/-. Aggrieved, the claimant filed First Appeal No. 3724 of 2014 before the High Court of Gujarat.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal Against Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Liberal Approach to Allowing Amendment for Enhancing Damages After 31 Years Upheld, with Issue of Limitation Kept Open for Trial Under C...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Loss of Uterus and Fetus in Motor Accident Claim. The Court held that the Tribunal's award of Rs. 2,50,000/- was inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 10,00,000/- considering the permanent...