Gujarat High Court Upholds Insurance Liability in Motor Accident Claim Despite Unlicensed Driver — Pay and Recover Principle Applied. Insurer directed to pay compensation to claimants of minor deceased and recover from owner/driver for breach of policy condition under Section 149 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a minor deceased, Vijay, who died in a road accident on 17.12.2017 when a dumper driven rashly and negligently by opponent No.1 dashed against his bicycle. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Morbi, in MACP No.29 of 2018, awarded compensation of Rs. 8,00,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization, holding the Insurance Company liable. The Insurance Company appealed, contending that the driver did not hold a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, as per the charge-sheet at Exhibit 33, and therefore the insurer should not be liable. The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, in First Appeal No.4879 of 2022, heard the appeal. The court noted that the Tribunal had already considered the issue of licence and applied the 'pay and recover' principle. The court held that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants even if the driver had no valid licence, as the breach of policy condition does not absolve liability towards third parties. The court directed the Insurance Company to pay the awarded amount to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle in accordance with law. The appeal was dismissed with the above modification.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Third-Party Liability - Pay and Recover - Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants even if the driver had no valid licence, but can recover the amount from the owner/driver - The court held that the insurer must pay and then recover from the insured, as the breach of policy condition does not absolve liability towards third parties (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company can be absolved from liability to pay compensation to third-party claimants when the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The Insurance Company is directed to pay the awarded amount to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Pay and recover principle
  • Breach of policy condition
  • Third-party liability
  • Driving without valid licence
  • Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 465

R/First Appeal No. 4879 of 2022

2026-01-20

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Mr. Rathin P. Raval for Appellant, Nishit A. Bhalodi for Respondents No.1,2

National Insurance Company Limited

Makanbhai Dahyabhai Nakum & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for death of minor in road accident.

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought to be absolved from liability to pay compensation on ground that driver had no valid driving licence.

Filing Reason

Insurance Company challenged the Tribunal's award saddling it with liability despite driver lacking valid licence.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Morbi, in MACP No.29 of 2018, awarded Rs. 8,00,000/- with 7.5% interest per annum, holding Insurance Company liable.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company can be absolved from liability to pay compensation to third-party claimants when the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company) argued that the driver was not holding a valid and effective driving licence at the time of accident, as per charge-sheet at Exhibit 33, violating Section 3 of Motor Vehicles Act, and thus the insurer should not be liable. Respondents (claimants) argued that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to third parties and can recover from the owner/driver.

Ratio Decidendi

The Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants even if the driver had no valid licence, as the breach of policy condition does not absolve liability towards third parties; the insurer can recover the amount from the owner/driver under the 'pay and recover' principle.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Tribunal has rightly considered the issue of driving licence and has rightly saddled the liability upon the appellant - Insurance Company with a direction to pay and recover the same from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. The Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants even if the driver had no valid licence, as the breach of policy condition does not absolve liability towards third parties.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Morbi, passed judgment and award dated 01.09.2022 in MACP No.29 of 2018 awarding compensation. The Insurance Company filed First Appeal No.4879 of 2022 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, which was heard and disposed of on 20.01.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 3, Section 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Insurance Liability in Motor Accident Claim Despite Unlicensed Driver — Pay and Recover Principle Applied. Insurer directed to pay compensation to claimants of minor deceased and recover from owner/driver for breach of po...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Laches and Participation of Original Grantee's Sons in Alienation. The Court held that proceedings under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of T...