Gujarat High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case — Assignment of Leasehold Rights Not a Supply of Service. Transfer of leasehold rights in land by way of assignment is not a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as it constitutes a transfer of title in goods or an interest in immovable property, not a service.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s Jubilee Engineers, was allotted a plot of land by the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) on a 99-year lease starting from 16.04.2018. Subsequently, the petitioner assigned and transferred its leasehold rights to M/s Kabir Instruments and Technology through a Deed of Assignment dated 08.05.2018, receiving a total consideration of Rs. 6,48,00,000. The petitioner was then served with a show cause notice dated 09.07.2024 under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, alleging that the assignment of leasehold rights constituted a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the Act and was classifiable under Heading 99792 of the Tariff Code. The petitioner challenged the notice by way of a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The court considered the narrow controversy of whether the assignment of leasehold rights amounts to a supply of service. The court held that the transfer of leasehold rights is not a supply of service but rather a transfer of title in goods or an interest in immovable property, and therefore the show cause notice was without jurisdiction. Consequently, the court quashed the show cause notice and allowed the petition.

Headnote

A) Goods and Services Tax - Supply of Service - Assignment of Leasehold Rights - Section 7(1)(a) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - The issue was whether the transfer of leasehold rights by the petitioner to another party amounts to a supply of service. The court held that such transfer is not a supply of service but a transfer of title in goods or an interest in immovable property, and thus the show cause notice was without jurisdiction. (Paras 4-10)

B) Goods and Services Tax - Show Cause Notice - Jurisdiction - Section 74 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - The court examined whether the show cause notice issued under Section 74 was valid. It held that since the assignment of leasehold rights does not fall within the definition of supply of service, the notice was without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. (Paras 4-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the assignment of leasehold rights in land by the petitioner to another party constitutes a 'supply of service' under Section 7(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and whether the show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Act is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the show cause notice dated 09.07.2024 and allowed the petition.

Law Points

  • Assignment of leasehold rights is not a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act
  • 2017
  • Transfer of leasehold rights is a transfer of title in goods or an interest in immovable property
  • Show cause notice without jurisdiction is liable to be quashed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:5771-DB

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14168 of 2024

2026-01-27

A.S. Supehia, Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:5771-DB

Darshan R Patel, Nidhi T Vyas

M/s Jubilee Engineers

Deputy Commissioner & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a show cause notice under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of show cause notice dated 09.07.2024.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was served with a show cause notice alleging that assignment of leasehold rights constitutes supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act.

Issues

Whether assignment of leasehold rights is a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017. Whether the show cause notice under Section 74 is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that assignment of leasehold rights is not a supply of service. Respondents argued that it is a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a).

Ratio Decidendi

Assignment of leasehold rights in land does not constitute a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as it is a transfer of title in goods or an interest in immovable property. Therefore, a show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Act for such assignment is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assails the correctness and validity of show cause notice dated 09.07.2024 rendered under Section 74 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017... GIDC had originally allotted land parcel in Plot No.274 at GIDC Estate, Makarpura, Vadodara to M/s. Jubilee Engineers on 99 years lease starting from 16.04.2018.

Procedural History

The petitioner was allotted land by GIDC on 99-year lease. It assigned leasehold rights to M/s Kabir Instruments and Technology on 08.05.2018. Show cause notice issued on 09.07.2024 under Section 74 of CGST Act. Petitioner filed writ petition challenging the notice. Heard on 27.01.2026 and judgment delivered.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 7(1)(a), Section 74
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case — Assignment of Leasehold Rights Not a Supply of Service. Transfer of leasehold rights in land by way of assignment is not a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the Central Goods and S...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Open Ballot Rule for Rajya Sabha Elections - Upholds Constitutionality of Rule 39-AA of Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 and Proviso to Section 33 of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Based on Proporti...