Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, appointed as a Male Nurse on 14.04.2011, was terminated based on initial medical unfitness findings but later reinstated after being declared fit -- During pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was reinstated, leaving only the regularization date in dispute -- The respondent Corporation regularized him w.e.f. 28.06.2014, while the petitioner claimed regularization from 14.04.2013 -- The Court found the break in service was due to medical opinions and not intentional absence, entitling the petitioner to continuity of service -- The Court directed regularization from 14.04.2013 and payment of salary for the intervening period, allowing the petition partly
Headnote
The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, in a writ petition filed under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India, addressed the issue of regularization date for an employee whose service was interrupted due to medical fitness disputes -- The petitioner, appointed as a Male Nurse on 14.04.2011 on fixed wage, faced termination based on initial medical unfitness findings, but was later reinstated after being declared fit by the Board of Referees -- The respondent Corporation regularized the petitioner w.e.f. 28.06.2014, while the petitioner claimed regularization should be from 14.04.2013, after completing two years from his original appointment -- The Court held that since the break in service was due to medical opinions and not intentional absence, the petitioner was entitled to continuity of service and regularization from the date he completed two years of service from his original appointment -- The Court directed the respondent to regularize the petitioner w.e.f. 14.04.2013 and pay salary for the intervening period
Premium Content
The Headnote is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access key legal points
Issue of Consideration: The Issue of regularization date for an employee whose service was interrupted due to medical fitness disputes
Premium Content
The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access critical case issues
Final Decision
The Court partly allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to regularize the petitioner w.e.f. 14.04.2013 instead of 28.06.2014 and to pay salary for the period from 14.04.2013 to 27.06.2014
