High Court Allows Compensation Appeal in Railway Accident Case - Boarding Incident Qualifies as Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 19
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court allowed an appeal challenging the Railway Claims Tribunal's dismissal of a compensation claim -- The deceased died while attempting to board Sahyadri Express at Pimpri Railway Station on 13 September 2010 when he tried to save his brother's wife from falling -- The Tribunal had rejected the claim, finding it did not constitute an 'untoward incident' -- The Court examined whether boarding accidents qualify as untoward incidents under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 -- Relying on Supreme Court and High Court precedents, the Court held that accidents during boarding/de-boarding constitute untoward incidents -- The deceased was a bona fide passenger with a valid ticket -- The Court set aside the Tribunal's order and directed compensation of Rs.4 lakhs with 6% interest from the accident date until payment, subject to a Rs.8 lakhs cap

Headnote

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed an appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's order that dismissed a compensation claim -- The Tribunal had held that the deceased's death while saving his brother's wife during boarding did not constitute an 'untoward incident' -- The Court examined Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 which defines 'untoward incident' -- The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rina Devi and this Court's decision in Damodar Purshottam Thakkar & Anr Vs. The Union of India -- The Court held that accidents while boarding or de-boarding trains fall within the ambit of 'untoward incident' -- The deceased was a bona fide passenger with a valid ticket -- The incident involved accidental falling from a train carrying passengers -- The Court quashed the Tribunal's order and directed compensation payment of Rs.4 lakhs with 6% interest

Issue of Consideration: Whether an accident occurring while boarding a train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989

Final Decision

Appeal allowed -- Tribunal order quashed and set aside -- Respondent directed to pay compensation of Rs.4 lakhs with 6% interest per annum from accident date until payment, subject to Rs.8 lakhs cap -- Amount to be remitted to appellant's bank account within eight weeks of application

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 135

First Appeal No.721 of 2018

2026-02-23

Jitendra Jain J.

2026:BHC-AS:9346

Mr. Mohan Rao, Ms. Leena Patil

Mangal Bhanudas Thombare

Union of India, Through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CSMT

Nature of Litigation: Appeal against Railway Claims Tribunal order dismissing compensation claim

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeking compensation for death in railway accident

Filing Reason

Tribunal dismissed claim holding accident did not constitute 'untoward incident'

Previous Decisions

Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai dismissed application on 28 February 2018

Issues

Whether the accident while boarding train constitutes 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued boarding/de-boarding accidents fall within ambit of untoward incident based on precedent cases -- Respondent argued death occurred while about to board train and trying to save another, constituting self-inflicted injury

Ratio Decidendi

Accidents occurring while boarding or de-boarding trains constitute 'untoward incidents' under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989 -- The phrase 'train carrying passengers' includes incidents during boarding process -- Saving another passenger during boarding does not convert accident into self-inflicted injury

Judgment Excerpts

'The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rina Devi (supra) has held that an accident while boarding or de-boarding the train would amount to "untoward incident" and not self-inflicted injury' -- 'This accident will surely fall within Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 which defines "untoward incident"' -- 'The incident of falling down while boarding the train will constitute an "untoward incident"'

Procedural History

Accident occurred on 13 September 2010 -- Railway Claims Tribunal dismissed application on 28 February 2018 -- First Appeal No.721 of 2018 filed in High Court -- High Court heard arguments on 23 February 2026 -- Appeal disposed of with directions for compensation

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Compensation Appeal in Railway Accident Case - Boarding Incide...
Related Judgement
High Court Court Directs Completion of Investigation in Harassment Case Involving Medical O...