High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Primary Milk Co-operative Societies Challenging Election Ineligibility. Eligibility to Vote in District Milk Union Elections Depends on Compliance with Bye-laws Requiring Minimum Milk Supply Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved several primary milk producers' co-operative societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, appealing against orders that declared them ineligible to vote in the election of the Managing Committee of the Tumkuru District Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Limited. The appellants had filed writ petitions challenging their ineligibility, which were dismissed by a single judge, leading to these writ appeals. The core issue revolved around the appellants' failure to meet the milk supply requirements specified in the bye-laws of the District Milk Union, particularly the obligation to supply an average of 150 kilograms of milk per day for at least 270 days in each cooperative year. The bye-laws, amended and registered in 2024, included provisions rendering member societies ineligible to vote if they failed to comply with these supply criteria. The appellants argued that their ineligibility was unjust, but the court examined the validity of the bye-law amendments and their registration under the Act. The court found that the bye-laws were properly amended and registered, making the eligibility criteria binding on all member societies. In its analysis, the court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in co-operative election matters, noting that courts should not interfere unless the bye-laws are arbitrary or contravene statutory provisions. The court concluded that the eligibility criteria based on milk supply were reasonable and aimed at ensuring active participation and commitment from member societies. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ appeals, upholding the single judge's orders and affirming the appellants' ineligibility to vote in the elections. The decision reinforced the principle that co-operative societies must adhere to their bye-laws, and judicial intervention is restricted to cases of legal infirmity.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Election Eligibility - Bye-law Compliance - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and Rules, 1960 - Appellants, primary milk producers' co-operative societies, challenged their ineligibility to vote in District Milk Union elections based on failure to supply minimum milk quantity as per bye-laws - Court examined bye-law amendments and registration, finding them valid and applicable - Held that eligibility criteria under bye-laws are binding and appellants' non-compliance justified their exclusion from voting (Paras 1-15).

B) Co-operative Law - Judicial Review - Election Disputes - Karnataka High Court Act, Section 4 - Appellants filed writ appeals under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act to set aside single judge orders dismissing their writ petitions - Court emphasized limited scope of judicial review in co-operative election matters, focusing on legality and procedural fairness - Held that courts should not interfere unless bye-laws are arbitrary or violate statutory provisions, and no such violation was established here (Paras 1-15).

Issue of Consideration: Whether the appellants, as primary milk producers' co-operative societies, were rightly held ineligible to vote in the election of the Managing Committee of the Tumkuru District Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Limited due to failure to meet milk supply requirements under the bye-laws

Final Decision

Writ appeals dismissed, upholding single judge orders and affirming appellants' ineligibility to vote

2026 LawText (KAR) (03) 8

WA No. 1811 of 2025 C/W WA No. 1816 of 2025, WA No. 1888 of 2025, WA No. 1892 of 2025

2026-03-10

Vibhu Bakhru, Chief Justice, C.M. Poonacha, Justice

Sri S.S. Naganand, Senior Advocate a/w Sri Aravind Reddy H., Advocate for appellants; Sri K.S. Harish, Government Advocate for respondents 1, 3, 4; Sri A. Devaraja, Advocate for respondent 2; Sri G. Narasi Reddy, Advocate for respondent 5; Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, Senior Advocate a/w Sri Kethan Kumar, Advocate for respondent 6

Ballenahalli Milk Producers Co-operative Society Ltd., Kothuru Milk Producers Co-operative Society Ltd., Gowdeti Milk Producers Women Co-operative Society Ltd., Murarayanahalli Women's Milk Producers Co-operative Society, Budda Reddy Halli Milk Producers Co-operative Society

The State of Karnataka, The Co-operative Election Commissioner, The Returning Officer/ Assistant Election Officer, The Tumkuru District Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Ltd., Sri Chennamallappa

Nature of Litigation: Writ appeals challenging orders declaring appellants ineligible to vote in District Milk Union elections

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside single judge orders and grant reliefs as prayed in writ petitions

Filing Reason

Appellants aggrieved by ineligibility to vote due to failure to meet milk supply requirements under bye-laws

Previous Decisions

Single judge dismissed writ petitions via orders dated 26.09.2025 and 13.10.2025

Issues

Whether appellants were rightly held ineligible to vote in District Milk Union elections based on bye-law compliance

Ratio Decidendi

Eligibility criteria under registered bye-laws are binding on member societies; judicial review in co-operative election matters is limited to legality and procedural fairness; appellants' non-compliance with milk supply requirements justified exclusion from voting

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants are the primary co-operative societies registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 They are aggrieved by the order finding them ineligible to vote in the election of the office-bearers of the Managing Committee The appellants were held ineligible to participate in the elections under the bye-laws of the District Milk Union, inter alia, on the ground that they had not supplied the requisite quantity of milk in the previous co-operative years

Procedural History

Appellants filed writ petitions challenging ineligibility; single judge dismissed petitions via orders dated 26.09.2025 and 13.10.2025; appellants filed writ appeals under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act to set aside those orders

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Primary Milk Co-operative Societies Challenging Election Ineligibility. Eligibility to Vote in District Milk Union Elections Depends on Compliance with Bye-laws Requiring Minimum Milk Supply Under Kar...
Related Judgement
High Court Revision Against Auditor’s Re-Audit Report Not Maintainable Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Auditor’s Findings in Re-Audit Report Do Not Constitute a ‘Decision’ or ‘Order’ – Administrative Orders Not R...