Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Production of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application for production of documents as Section 294 CrPC permits production at any stage if relevant for just decision.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed an application under Section 294 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking permission to produce certain documents and for a direction to the complainant to admit or deny them. The documents included a registered sale deed dated 25.07.2012, a correction deed dated 05.09.2014, revised development permissions dated 18.10.2012 and 28.09.2023, a TILR map, and a newspaper publication. The petitioners contended that these documents were relevant to their defence and that the sale deed had been deliberately suppressed by the complainant. The complainant opposed the application, arguing that Section 294 CrPC only contemplates admission or denial of documents and that the documents should have been filed earlier. The learned 11th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, by order dated 14.11.2025, rejected the application. The petitioners then approached the High Court by way of a criminal writ petition. The High Court examined the scope of Section 294 CrPC and held that the provision does not impose any time limit for production of documents. The court observed that the documents sought to be produced were relevant for the just decision of the case and that the accused should be permitted to place them on record. The court further noted that similar applications had been filed in all four complaints instituted by the complainant. The High Court set aside the impugned order and allowed the application, directing the complainant to admit or deny the documents within a specified period.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Section 294 CrPC - Production of Documents - The accused sought to produce sale deed, correction deed, development permissions, TILR map and newspaper to support defence in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 NI Act - The Magistrate rejected the application on the ground that documents were not filed earlier - Held that Section 294 CrPC does not impose any time limit and the court has discretion to permit production at any stage if relevant for just decision - Impugned order set aside, application allowed (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Magistrate can refuse permission to produce documents under Section 294 CrPC on the ground that they were not filed earlier

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 14.11.2025 is set aside. Application Exh. 36 in S.C.C. No. 7117 of 2019 is allowed. The petitioners are permitted to produce the documents. The complainant shall admit or deny the documents within a period of four weeks from the date of production.

Law Points

  • Section 294 CrPC permits production of documents at any stage
  • admission or denial is a procedural step
  • documents relevant for defence must be allowed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:BHC-AUG:16190

Criminal Writ Petition No. 79 of 2026

2026-04-16

Mehroz K. Pathan, J.

2026:BHC-AUG:16190

Mr. S. S. Patil for Petitioners, Ms. P. J. Bharad APP for Respondent No. 1, Mr. P. F. Patni for Respondent No. 2

M/s Ascent Ventures, Sameer Ramanlal Bhandari, Darshana Sameer Bhandari, Ramanlal Chunnilal Bhandari

The State of Maharashtra, Dr. Sachin Gopalrao Saoji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging order rejecting application under Section 294 CrPC for production of documents

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 14.11.2025 and allowing application Exh. 36 in S.C.C. No. 7117 of 2019

Filing Reason

Magistrate rejected application for production of documents under Section 294 CrPC

Previous Decisions

Order dated 14.11.2025 passed by 11th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad rejecting Exh. 36

Issues

Whether the Magistrate can refuse permission to produce documents under Section 294 CrPC on the ground that they were not filed earlier

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: Documents are relevant for defence and Section 294 CrPC permits production at any stage; Complainant: Section 294 only contemplates admission or denial and documents should have been filed earlier

Ratio Decidendi

Section 294 CrPC does not impose any time limit for production of documents. The court has discretion to permit production at any stage if the documents are relevant for the just decision of the case. The Magistrate erred in rejecting the application solely on the ground that the documents were not filed earlier.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 294 Cr.P.C. does not impose any time limit for production of documents. The documents sought to be produced are relevant for the just decision of the case.

Procedural History

Complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed by respondent no.2 against petitioners in S.C.C. No. 7117 of 2019. Petitioners filed application Exh. 36 under Section 294 CrPC for production of documents. Magistrate rejected application on 14.11.2025. Petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 79 of 2026 in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 294
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Production of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application for production of documents as Section ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Attempt to Murder in Absence of Common Intention. Appellant's Role Limited to Non-Fatal Injury, No Prior Meeting of Minds Established Under Section 34 IPC.