Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Dr. Rajesh Kumar D, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. He sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.2 (Directorate of Medical Education) and No.3 (Karnataka Examination Authority) to restore his seat in MD Respiratory Medicine at Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Respiratory and Chest Diseases, Bangalore, which he had secured in the first round of counseling. Additionally, he sought a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned communication/letter dated 25.02.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent, which cancelled his seat. The respondents included the State of Karnataka, Directorate of Medical Education, Karnataka Examination Authority, National Medical Commission, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, and others. The petitioner was represented by Smt. Akkamahadevi Hiremath, while the respondents were represented by various advocates. The court, comprising Chief Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar and Justice T.G. Shivashankare Gowda, heard the matter and reserved it for order. The judgment was delivered on 22nd February 2024. The court examined the facts and found that the petitioner had secured the seat in the first round of counseling but failed to join within the stipulated time. As per the counseling rules, non-joining within the prescribed period leads to forfeiture of the seat. The court held that the cancellation was valid and in accordance with the rules. The petitioner's argument that principles of natural justice were violated was rejected because the rules clearly provided for automatic forfeiture. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the cancellation of the seat.
Headnote
A) Medical Education - Admission - Cancellation of Seat - Non-joining within stipulated time - Petitioner secured MD Respiratory Medicine seat in first round of counseling but failed to join within the prescribed period - Held that as per counseling rules, failure to join results in forfeiture of seat and no further claim - Court dismissed petition (Paras 1-10). B) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Restoration of Seat - Petitioner sought direction to restore seat - Held that writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel restoration when petitioner failed to comply with rules - No legal right exists (Paras 1-10). C) Constitutional Law - Writ of Certiorari - Quashing of Communication - Petitioner sought quashing of cancellation letter dated 25.02.2022 - Held that cancellation was in accordance with rules and no illegality - Petition dismissed (Paras 1-10).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's MD seat for non-joining within the stipulated time was valid and whether the petitioner was entitled to restoration of the seat.
Final Decision
The writ petition is dismissed. The cancellation of the petitioner's seat is upheld.
Law Points
- Principles of natural justice
- Admission counseling rules
- Mandamus
- Certiorari
- Medical education admissions



