High Court Quashes Appointment of Non-Official Member to Cooperative Society Board Pending Election Notification Under Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 — Appointment Made After Election Notification Held Invalid as It Would Affect Composition of Board and Free and Fair Elections.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, L.N. Shivareddy, an elected director of the 4th respondent society, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a notification dated 09.02.2024 issued by the 1st respondent (State of Karnataka). By that notification, the State, in exercise of power under Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, appointed the 5th respondent, Shri Jayaram Reddy, as a non-official member (Adhikaarethara Sadasya) of the society. The petitioner contended that elections for the post of directors had already been notified and were scheduled to be held on 11.02.2024, and that the appointment of a non-official member after the election notification would affect the composition of the board and the free and fair election process. The respondents argued that the appointment was validly made under the Act. The court examined the provisions of Section 28-A(4-B)(1) and noted that the power to appoint non-official members is intended to ensure representation of certain categories, but such appointment cannot be made after the election process has commenced as it would disturb the composition of the board and the electoral process. The court held that the appointment was invalid and quashed the notification insofar as it pertained to the 4th respondent society. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Appointment of Non-Official Member - Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Validity of appointment after election notification - The petitioner, an elected director of the society, challenged the appointment of respondent No.5 as a non-official member made on 09.02.2024, after the election notification was issued. The court held that such appointment would affect the composition of the board and the free and fair election process, and thus quashed the appointment. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of a non-official member (Adhikaarethara Sadasya) to the board of a cooperative society after the issuance of election notification is valid under Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notification dated 09.02.2024 insofar as it pertained to the 4th respondent society. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1959
  • Appointment of non-official member
  • Election notification
  • Free and fair elections
  • Writ of certiorari
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2024:KHC:14871

WP No. 4979 of 2024 (CS-RES)

2024-04-15

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

NC: 2024:KHC:14871

Sri. Devi Prasad Shetty (for petitioner), Sri. Sidharth Babu Rao (AGA for R1-R3), Sri. Kalyan R (for R5)

L.N. Shivareddy

State of Karnataka, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies/District Election Officer, Returning Officer, Laginayakanahalli Milk Producers Cooperative Society Ltd., and Shri Jayaram Reddy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging appointment of non-official member to cooperative society board after election notification.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notification dated 09.02.2024 appointing respondent No.5 as non-official member.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, an elected director, contended that the appointment after election notification would affect the composition of the board and free and fair elections.

Issues

Whether the appointment of a non-official member after the issuance of election notification is valid under Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the appointment after election notification would affect the composition of the board and the free and fair election process. Respondents contended that the appointment was validly made under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to appoint non-official members under Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 cannot be exercised after the election notification has been issued, as such appointment would affect the composition of the board and the free and fair election process.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, who is the elected Director of 4th respondent - Society has filed the present petition seeking issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the notification dated 09.02.2024 at Annexure-E issued by respondent No.1, whereby the Government has in exercise of power under Section 28-A (4-B) (1) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 made appointment of respondent No.5 as a 'Adhikaarethara Sadasya' i.e., non-official member vide order dated 09.02.2024. Elections for the post of the directors was conducted and the results were announced on 11.02.2024 and the dat

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging the notification dated 09.02.2024. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 15.04.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959: Section 28-A(4-B)(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Appointment of Non-Official Member to Cooperative Society Board Pending Election Notification Under Section 28-A(4-B)(1) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 — Appointment Made After Election Notification Held Invalid as...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction on Home Guards' Duty Call-up Allowance in Compliance with Grah Rakshak Judgment. The court held that the allowance must be recalculated based on the minimum pay of police constables in Orissa, including ba...