High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Commissioner's Order in Waqf Property Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Entry of Waqf Board's Name in Revenue Records Set Aside as Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing to Petitioner.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Chennamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, challenging an order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Lingasugur (3rd respondent). The impugned order directed the entry of the 5th respondent, the District Wakf Officer, Raichur, in column nos. 9 and 11 of the revenue records of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.179/5 of Karadkal Village, Tq. Lingasugur, Dist. Raichur. The petitioner contended that the order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing to her, in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the Regional Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Tahasildar, and District Wakf Officer, were represented by counsel. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the impugned order was indeed passed without notice to the petitioner and without following due process. The court held that such an order cannot be sustained and accordingly quashed the order dated 14.02.2022. The court further directed the respondents to delete the entry of the 5th respondent's name from the revenue records of the petitioner's land. The writ petition was allowed with the above directions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writs - Certiorari and Mandamus - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner challenged order of Assistant Commissioner directing entry of Waqf Board's name in revenue records of her land without notice or hearing - Court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and quashed it, directing deletion of the entry - Held that no order adverse to a party can be passed without affording an opportunity of hearing (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Lingasugur, directing entry of the 5th respondent's name in the revenue records of the petitioner's land, was valid when passed without notice or hearing to the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 14.02.2022 bearing No. SAM/KKAM/DEVASTAN/12/2021-22 passed by the 3rd respondent is quashed. The respondents are directed to delete the entry of the 5th respondent's name in column nos. 9 and 11 of the revenue records of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.179/5 of Karadkal Village, Tq. Lingasugur, Dist. Raichur.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Waqf property
  • Revenue records
  • Writ of certiorari
  • Writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (08) 53

WP No. 202162 of 2022 (KLR-RR/SUR)

2024-08-06

Suraj Govindaraj

Sri. Ravi B. Patil (for petitioner), Smt. Maya T.R. (HCGP for R1 to R4), Sri P.S. Malipatil (for R5)

Smt. Chennamma

The Regional Commissioner, Kalaburagi Region; The Deputy Commissioner and President District Task Force Committee (Waqf), Raichur; The Assistant Commissioner, Lingasugur; The Tahasildar and Member District Task Force Committee (Waqf), Manvi; The District Wakf Officer, Waqf Raichur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Assistant Commissioner directing entry of Waqf Board's name in revenue records.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent (Assistant Commissioner) and a writ of mandamus directing respondents to delete the entry of the 5th respondent's name in the revenue records of her land.

Filing Reason

The impugned order was passed without notice or hearing to the petitioner, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the impugned order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner is valid when passed without notice or hearing to the petitioner?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, in violation of natural justice. Respondents did not contest the violation of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order passed without notice or opportunity of hearing to the affected party is in violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. Such an order is liable to be quashed and the consequential entries in revenue records must be deleted.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent is without due process of law and is not in due compliance with the procedure known to law. The order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, challenging the order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Lingasugur. The petition was heard and disposed of on 06.08.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Commissioner's Order in Waqf Property Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Entry of Waqf Board's Name in Revenue Records Set Aside as Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing to Petitioner.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Bail with Conditions in Money Laundering Case. Bail Granted Amid Allegations of Corruption in Teacher Recruitment Scam, Subject to Strict Monitoring and Safeguards.