Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Low Tax Effect — CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019 applied to bar appeal where tax effect is below prescribed threshold.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30.11.2011 for the assessment year 2000-01. During the hearing, the assessee's senior counsel submitted that the returned income was Rs.1,29,19,590/- and the effective addition was Rs.2,12,74,378/-, resulting in a tax payable of only Rs.81,90,635/-. The assessee argued that in view of the CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019, which prescribes a minimum tax effect for filing appeals, the appeal was not maintainable. The revenue's counsel did not dispute this submission. The court, after considering the circular, held that the appeal is not maintainable and dismissed it as withdrawn. The judgment was delivered by a division bench of the Karnataka High Court.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Appeal - Low Tax Effect - Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019 - The revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Act against the order of the ITAT. The assessee contended that the tax effect was only Rs.81,90,635/-, which is below the threshold prescribed by the CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019. The court held that in view of the circular, the appeal is not maintainable and dismissed it as withdrawn. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable in view of the low tax effect, considering the CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn in view of CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019.

Law Points

  • Low tax effect
  • CBDT Circular
  • Section 260-A
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Appeal not maintainable
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 54

I.T.A. NO.97 OF 2012

2020-07-08

Alok Aradhe, Hemant Chandangoudar

E.I. Sanmathi (for revenue), A. Shankar (Senior Counsel) with M. Lava (for assessee)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

M/s. Nirman Shelters (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of ITAT.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside the ITAT order and formulate substantial questions of law.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by ITAT order dated 30.11.2011 for assessment year 2000-01.

Previous Decisions

ITAT 'A' Bench, Bangalore passed order in ITA No.1103/Bang/2010 dated 30.11.2011.

Issues

Whether the appeal is maintainable in view of low tax effect as per CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019.

Submissions/Arguments

Assessee submitted that tax effect is only Rs.81,90,635/-, below threshold prescribed by CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019, hence appeal not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not maintainable if the tax effect is below the threshold prescribed by the CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019.

Judgment Excerpts

When the matter was taken up today, learned Senior counsel for the assessee submitted that the returned income in response to the notice issued under Section 153A of the Act was `1,29,19,590/- and effective addition of `2,12,74,378/- has been made and therefore, the tax payable by the assessee is only `81,90,635/- and therefore, in view of the CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019, the appeal is not maintainable.

Procedural History

Revenue filed appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against ITAT order dated 30.11.2011. During hearing, assessee raised objection regarding low tax effect. Court dismissed appeal as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260-A, 153A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Low Tax Effect — CBDT Circular dated 20.09.2019 applied to bar appeal where tax effect is below prescribed threshold.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in Matka Gambling Case for Lack of Incriminating Material. Section 78(3) Karnataka Police Act, 1963 requires presence or participation; mere naming in charge-sheet insufficient.