High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antecedents. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 62, 86, 87 of Karnataka Forest Act and Rule 154 of Karnataka Forest Rules.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Vijay Kumar K., filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in F.O.C.No.10/2005-06 (C.C.No.17/2020) registered by the Range Forest Officer, Sringeri, Chikkamagaluru District, for alleged offences under Sections 62, 86, and 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, and Rule 154 of the Karnataka Forest Rules. The case of the prosecution was that a case was registered against the petitioner and two others for the aforesaid offences. After investigation, a chargesheet in C.C.No.265/2006 was filed showing the petitioner as absconding. Consequently, the trial Court ordered to split up the case against the petitioner and numbered it as C.C.No.17/2010, issuing NBW followed by proclamation and attachment under Sections 82 and 83 of CrPC. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was not involved in any other criminal case, had no criminal antecedents, and the trial was likely to take a long time as the case was of the year 2005-06. The High Court, after hearing both sides, observed that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and the trial was pending for a long time. The Court held that the prolonged incarceration without trial violates Article 21 of the Constitution and granted bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. The Court directed the petitioner to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, and imposed conditions including that the petitioner shall not tamper with prosecution evidence, shall appear before the trial Court regularly, and shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Long Pendency - Petitioner sought bail in a forest offence case registered in 2005-06, with trial pending for over 14 years - Court held that prolonged incarceration without trial violates Article 21 and bail should be granted considering the long delay and no criminal antecedents (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on bail in a forest offence case where the trial has been pending for over 14 years and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in F.O.C.No.10/2005-06 (C.C.No.17/2020) pending on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sringeri, Chikkamagaluru District, subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petitioner shall not tamper with prosecution evidence, shall appear before the trial Court regularly, and shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Karnataka Forest Act
  • Sections 62
  • 86
  • 87
  • Rule 154 Karnataka Forest Rules
  • Long Pendency
  • No Criminal Antecedents
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 204

Criminal Petition No.2947 of 2020

2020-07-08

Suraj Govindaraj

Sri M.R. Balakrishna, M.R. Balakrishna and Associates (for petitioner), Sri Thejesh P., HCGP (for respondent)

Mr. Vijay Kumar K.

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 of CrPC for offences under Karnataka Forest Act and Rules.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought enlargement on bail in F.O.C.No.10/2005-06 (C.C.No.17/2020).

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody in a forest offence case registered in 2005-06, and trial was pending for a long time.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court had split up the case against the petitioner and issued NBW, proclamation, and attachment under Sections 82 and 83 of CrPC.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC considering the long pendency of the trial and no criminal antecedents.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was not involved in any other criminal case, had no criminal antecedents, and the trial was likely to take a long time as the case was of the year 2005-06. Respondent's counsel opposed the bail petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Prolonged incarceration without trial violates Article 21 of the Constitution. Bail should be granted considering the long delay in trial and the petitioner having no criminal antecedents.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking to be enlarged on bail in F.O.C.No.10/2005-06 (C.C.No.17/2020) registered by the respondent – Forest Officials for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 62, 86 and 87 of Karnataka Forest Act and under Rule 154 of Karnataka Forest Rules pending trial before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sringeri, Chikkamagaluru District. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents and the trial is pending for a long time. Hence, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

Procedural History

A case was registered in F.O.C.No.10/2005-06 against the petitioner and two others. After investigation, chargesheet in C.C.No.265/2006 was filed showing the petitioner as absconding. The trial Court split up the case against the petitioner and numbered it as C.C.No.17/2010, issuing NBW followed by proclamation and attachment under Sections 82 and 83 of CrPC. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. He then filed Criminal Petition No.2947 of 2020 under Section 439 CrPC for bail.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439, 82, 83
  • Karnataka Forest Act, 1963: 62, 86, 87
  • Karnataka Forest Rules: 154
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antecedents. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 62, 86, 87 of Karnataka Forest Act and Rule 154 of ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is...