Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision, Dismisses Appeals in Sandalwood Confiscation Case: Forest Department Directed to Adhere to Government Scheme
                                
                                
                                
                                
                             
                            
                                
                             
                            
                                
                              
                                
                                Summary of Judgement
                                Forest Offence, Sandalwood Confiscation, Kerala Forest Act, Government Scheme
1. Background:
- The appeals arising from the High Court judgment dated 13.08.2010.
 
- Writ petitions allowed by the High Court, setting aside the sandalwood confiscation order.
 
- Appeals filed by the State of Kerala and its Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar, against the High Court decision.
 
2. Parties and Claims:
- P.J. Antony and Cheriyan Kuruvila were petitioners in the writ petitions before the High Court.
 
- Claims of ownership and possession over specific land parcels in Marayoor Village.
 
- Applications made to Tahsildar for handing over dried and fallen sandalwood trees to Forest Department.
 
3. Inspection and Certificates:
- Reports of Taluk Surveyor confirming fallen sandalwood trees.
 
- Certificates issued by Village Officer for conducting auction of sandalwood trees.
 
4. Subsequent Events:
- Joint application submitted to Divisional Forest Officer.
 
- Seizure of sandalwood trees by Range Officer.
 
- Confiscation orders passed and subsequent legal actions.
 
5. High Court Judgment:
- Lack of evidence of forest offence.
 
- Rejection of Forest Department's claims based on procedural irregularities.
 
- Emphasis on documentation and actions of petitioners before authorities.
 
6. Analysis of Evidence:
- Critique of Divisional Forest Officer's dismissal of Revenue officials' reports.
 
- Questioning of enhanced figures of seized sandalwood trees.
 
- Rejection of Forest Department's presumption of forest offence.
 
7. Legal Principles:
- Interpretation of "reason to believe" under Forest Act.
 
- Clarification of presumption under Section 69 of the Forest Act.
 
- Requirements for formation of opinion by authorities.
 
8. Conclusion:
- Upholding High Court decision to set aside confiscation order.
 
- Directing Forest Department to proceed according to Government scheme.
 
- Dismissal of appeals without costs.
 
9. Additional Remarks:
- Mention of failure in maintaining records by Forest Department.
 
- Reference to a previous judgment highlighting lapses in forest management.
 
10. Disposition:
- Dismissal of appeals.
 
- Direction for expeditious compliance with Government scheme.
 
- No imposition of costs on parties.
 
11. Pending Applications:
- Dismissal of any pending applications.
 
                             
                                                                                    
                            
                                                        
                             
                                                            Case Title: Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar, Kerala, And Another vs P.J. Antony, Etc.
                                                                                        Citation: 2024 LawText (SC) (5) 141
                                                                                        Case Number: Civil Appeal Nos. 9751-9752 Of 2011
                                                                                                                    Advocate(s): Nishe Rajen Shonker, Gaurav Aggarwal, K.Parameshwar, Saiby Jose Kidangoor, Kanti, Chinmay Kalgaonkar, Raji Gururaj
                                                                                    
                            
                                Date of Decision: 2024-05-14