Quashing of FIR: Supreme Court Exercising Powers under Article 142 Resolving Discrepancies and Lack of Evidence

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Appeal by special leave against the order of the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissing a petition to quash FIR No. 590 of 2019. The FIR was filed by the complainant, alleging trespass, demolition of property, and theft. The appellant challenged the FIR, claiming it was false and fabricated. After considering submissions, the Supreme Court quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Appeal allowed, pending applications disposed of.

1. Legal Proceedings:

Previous attempts to quash the FIR through writ petition and Section 482 of CrPC were unsuccessful. Appeal filed challenging the High Court's order.

2. Arguments by Appellant's Counsel:

Contention that the entire case is fabricated. Discrepancies in FIR and investigation reports. Allegations deemed vague and uncertain.

3. Opposing Arguments:

State counsel opposes appellant's submissions. Asserts complainant had no motive to falsely implicate the accused. Affirmation of allegations during investigation.

4. Court's Analysis:

No clear motive established for false implication. Discrepancies noted in FIR and investigation findings. Lack of evidence to support allegations.

 

Issue of Consideration: SHIVENDRA PRATAP SINGH THAKUR @ BANTI VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS.

2024 LawText (SC) (5) 154

[Criminal Appeal No(s).________ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No(s). 1400 of 2024]

2024-05-15

(B.R. Gavai) J. (Satish Chandra Sharma) J. (Sandeep Mehta)J.

SHIVENDRA PRATAP SINGH THAKUR @ BANTI

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS.

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Quashing of FIR: Supreme Court Exercising Powers under Article 142 Resolving Dis...
Related Judgement
High Court Pensionary Benefits for Voluntarily Retired Employees Covered Under Grant-in-Aid...