Search Results for "loss of income during treatment"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court allowed Insurance Company's Appeal and also cross objection of claimant for Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim -- Tribunal's Award Modified with Increased Compensation

The High Court heard two connected matters: Insurance Company challenging the Tribunal's award holding them liable, and MFA CROB No.27/2014 filed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability Due to Truck-Bus Collision. Claimant's income assessed at Rs.5,000 per month with 40% future prospects, and compensation increased from Rs.2,13,000 to Rs.7,47,000 with 7.5% interest.

The appellant, Rameshbhai Nanabhai Vagadiya, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case, Emphasizes Just and Fair Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Court Reiterates Principle of "Just Compensation" Beyond Claimed Amount, Modifies High Court and Tribunal Awards.

Just Compensation – The Supreme Court reiterated the principle that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, should be "just" and "reasonab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence and Lack of Income Proof. Claimant's disability assessed at 10% whole body, but contributory negligence of 50% applied as accident occurred due to negligence of both rider and claimant.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 31.12.2018 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC and MACT, N.R.Pura in MVC No.540/2017. The appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Multiplier Applied Based on Age and Notional Income Assessed at Rs. 9,000 per Month.

The appellant, Sri Abhishek B.R., a 26-year-old bachelor, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensati...