Search Results for "Estoppel"

118 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Registration. Compromise Decree Arising from Family Settlement Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908, as Parties Had Pre-existing Rights as Heirs.

The dispute involved two sons of late Vijendra Singh contesting ownership of ancestral land. The appellant filed a suit for possession in 1978, disput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Decides Teacher Recruitment Dispute Involving Termination and Natural Justice. Case Involves SEBC (Women) Category Appointment Under 1996 Resolution and Tribunal Orders on Reinstatement.

The dispute arose from the recruitment of primary school teachers in Odisha under a 1996 resolution. Respondent No. 1, Kamalini Khilar, was appointed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Family Settlement Memorandum Registration. Court holds that memorandum recording pre-existing family arrangement does not require registration under Indian Registration Act, 1908, and parties acting upon it are estopped from resiling.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in a second appeal, which reversed the first appellate court's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Company Law Dispute Over Maintainability of Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Nomination Under Section 72 of Companies Act, 2013 Vests Rights in Nominee, Excluding Legal Heirs from Claiming Shares for Petition Maintainability Under Sections 241 and 242.

The dispute arose from a family tussle following the death of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, who held significant shares in Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and Oswal Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...