Search Results for "Service Rules"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Teachers in University Appointment Validity Dispute - Appointments Made Under Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 Remain Valid Despite University's Conversion to Central University Under Central Universities Act, 2009.

The dispute involved teachers appointed as Associate Professors/Assistant Professors in the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at H.N.B. Garhwal Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Impleadment Applications by IPS Officers in Central Armed Police Forces Recruitment Rules Case. Impleadment Denied as Applicants Lacked Direct Legal Interest and Were Not Necessary Parties Under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with interlocutory applications filed by Indian Police Service officers seeking impleadment in special leave petitions arising...