Search Results for "fraud"

733 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 733 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Remand Order in Property Dispute - Concurrent Findings on Limitation Upheld. High Court Erred in Remanding Matter for Fresh Trial Instead of Deciding Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appeal arose from a property dispute involving a joint Hindu family. The litigation originated from a 1965 suit (O.S.No.851 of 1965) filed by Sund...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Former Judicial Officer in Sexual Offence Case, Upholding Charges Under Sections 376(2)(f), 417, and 506 IPC Based on Prima Facie Evidence of False Promise to Marriage and Exploitation

<p>The Appellant, a former judicial officer, sought discharge from charges under Sections 376(2)(f), 417, and 506 IPC, alleging a consensual rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation and Mis-statements. NCLAT's Refusal to Condon Delay Upheld as Appellant Failed to Apply for Certified Copies and Made Contradictory Assertions Under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeals arose from an order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which dismissed appeals preferred by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employees Against Recovery Orders in Service Law Case Due to Lack of Hearing and Erroneous Employer Interpretation. Recovery of Excess Payments After Retirement Held Illegal as No Misrepresentation by Employees and Based on Equity Principles to Prevent Hardship.

The dispute involved retired stenographers who had been granted financial benefits in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations, which were ...