Search Results for "Section 27"

271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Criminal Antecedents. The High Court's orders granting bail were cryptic and did not consider the gravity of the offence or the criminal antecedents of the accused.

The appeals were filed by the informant-appellant, the mother of the deceased Rupesh Kumar, challenging the orders dated 22.07.2021 and 13.09.2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in Triple Murder Case Under IPC Sections 302, 201, 506B. The court affirmed the conviction based on reliable ocular evidence and upheld death penalty due to brutal nature of murders involving severance of necks of three relatives.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and death sentence imposed on the appellant for the murders of three rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Rash and Negligent Driving Case. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Maintained While Substantive Imprisonment Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Mitigating Circumstances Including Compensation Payment and Family Situation.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...