Search Results for "buyer"

Trending :

Search Results for "buyer"

185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

1 Jan 2020

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeal in Part, Reducing Interest Rate on Refund for Delayed Possession of Row House. Buyer's Agreement's One-Sided Clause on Delay Interest Does Not Preclude Claim for Reasonable Compensation; Refund Upheld but Interest Reduced from 12% to 9%.

25 Mar 2019

The case involves a dispute between Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd (the developer/appellant) and Devasis Rudra (the buyer/respondent) arising...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Export Credit Guarantee Corporation in Insurance Claim Dispute — Exclusion Clause for Collecting Bank's Default Applies. The court held that the loss arose from the default of the collecting bank, BHCI, which released documents without acceptance, and thus the insurer was not liable under the Shipments Policy.

13 Mar 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. (ECGC), the appellant, and M.S. Creations, the first respond...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Booth Allottee for Persistent Default in Payment - Resumption Order Confirmed. Rank defaulter not entitled to relief despite multiple opportunities; Article 142 cannot protect unscrupulous buyer who paid only 25% of sale consideration and defaulted for 23 years.

21 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Rajiv Vohra against the State of Haryana and others, confirming the resumption order passed by the Est...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Holds That Objections to Enforceability Must Be Raised Under Section 48 and That Pendency of Civil Suit Does Not Bar Execution

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions filed by LMJ International Ltd. and Sri Munisuvrata Agri International Ltd. against the judgme...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)