Search Results for "Perversity"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Will Dispute, Restoring Lower Courts' Findings on Genuineness. High Court's Interference Under Section 100 CPC Held Impermissible as It Re-appreciated Evidence and Formulated Question of Law Incorrectly Based on Factual Findings.

The dispute centered on the genuineness of a Will executed by Kishan Singh on 10 December 1974, bequeathing agricultural land to Harnam Singh, a non-r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Issues. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860, Amid Pathway Dispute and Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple criminal appeals arising from a common occurrence involving a pathway dispute between the prime accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Suppression of Material Facts in Land Acquisition Dispute. Writ petitioner must disclose all relevant facts including prior civil suit and appeal; failure to do so disentitles equitable relief under Article 226.

The case involves an appeal by the sons of M. Krishna Reddy against the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and others. The appellants claimed that ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Due to Tribunal's Excessive Interference. Tribunal Erred by Applying Criminal Standard of Proof and Revisiting Evidence De Novo Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Contrary to Limited Scope of Judicial Review.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a workman, R.C. Srivastava, by Standard Chartered Bank following a domestic enquiry into allegations of miscon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Proceedings Against Litigant for Frivolous Filings and Disparaging Judicial Remarks. Court imposed costs and restrictions on future public interest litigations due to abuse of process and violation of orders under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed by Suraz India Trust, represented by its chairman Mr. Rajiv Daiya, against the Union of India. The S...