Search Results for "Arbitral Award"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Time Extension Applications Under Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Family Settlement Dispute

The Supreme Court addressed a civil appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition concerning jurisdiction for time extension applications under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Arbitration Cases -- Appellants Failed to Prove Grounds Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Setting Aside Arbitral Awards

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed multiple Miscellaneous First Appeals filed by landowners against arbitral awards related to land acquisition by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Of Land Owner Appellant, Sets Aside High Court Order Cancelling Land Acquisition Award -- No Allegations Of Collusion Or Unjust Enrichment Against Appellant -- Award Restored Under Land Acquisition (Special Railway Projects) Rules, 2016 And Railways Act, 1989

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellant, a land owner, challenging the High Court order which had set aside the land acquisition award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Post-Foreign Award Relief in Commercial Arbitration Dispute - Vessel Sale Prior to Petition Filing Renders Relief Infructuous

The High Court dismissed a commercial arbitration petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Contractual Bar on Pendente Lite Interest: Strict Construction Required Under Arbitration Act, 1940. Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Power to Award Interest Unless Expressly Barred in Contract

Arbitration Act1940 Act: Arbitrator has inherent power to award pendente lite interest unless expressly barred by contract (Para 8, 10). Strict Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquisition of Land by the State – Authority of the Beneficiary Board – Public Policy Violation – Arbitrability of Land Acquisition Disputes – Effect of Illegal Agreements – Fraud on Sovereign Power

Acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, once completed with possession taken, results in absolute vesting in the Government, beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Award Upheld on Waste Collection Contract Dispute. High Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Price Escalation, Waste Segregation, and Jurisdiction in Municipal Waste Management Contract

Arbitration Jurisdiction – The High Court held that the arbitration clause in the original contract covered the Ghansoli Area, which was later merg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Award Set Aside – Fresh Arbitration Permissible. Supreme Court’s Observations on Merits Do Not Bar Fresh Arbitration – Section 11 Application Allowed

Arbitration Award Set Aside – The Arbitral Award was set aside by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Application, Holds Limitation and Due Diligence as Key Issues in Share Recovery Suit. Summary Judgment Denied in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Need for Oral Evidence

Summary Judgment under Order XIII-A of the CPC: The Court held that a summary judgment can only be granted if the Defendant has no real prospect of d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes District Court Judgment, Restores Arbitration Challenge for Fresh Consideration on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Failure to Address Key Contentions. Arbitration Award Set Aside for Reconsideration Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Scope of Section 34: The Court held that while the scope of interference under Section 34 is limited, the District Judge must consider specific chal...