Search Results for "Customs Act"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Authorities in Classification Dispute Over Imported Goods as High Speed Diesel. Goods Classified as Prohibited High Speed Diesel Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Leading to Confiscation and Penalties Under Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute centered on the classification of imported goods by three appellant companies, who declared them as Base Oil under Chapter Heading 2710196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act, Citing Lack of Consideration of Bail Conditions. Court Emphasizes Scrutiny of Detention Orders and Upholds Liberty in Preventive Detention Cases

Preventive Detention and Bail Conditions: The detaining authority must consider the efficacy of bail conditions imposed by the court before ordering ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Arrest Powers Under Customs Act and GST Acts: Safeguards and Judicial Review. Balancing Individual Liberty and State Authority in Tax Evasion Cases

Arrest Powers Under Customs Act and GST Acts:-- The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of arrest provisions under the Customs Act, 1962...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal Upheld in Contraband Gold Case. Procedural and evidentiary gaps lead to dismissal of the appeal against acquittal.

The Bombay High Court upheld the acquittal of Smt. Ameenabi, accused of possessing contraband gold under the Customs Act, 1962, and the Gold (Control)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Pre-Deposit Requirement Mandatory Under Section 129E of Customs Act: Relief Denied. Relief under Article 226 for pre-deposit waiver cannot override the statutory mandate under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962.

1. Relief Sought by Petitioners (Paras 1–2) The Petitioners sought: Waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses B.V. Jewels' Plea, Upholds Interest Demand on Customs Liability" "Customs Act’s interest provisions reaffirmed; liabilities clarified."

Acts and Sections Discussed: Customs Act, 1962: Section 18(3): Interest on final/re-assessment orders. Section 28: Recovery of duties not levie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Resolving Bureaucratic Glitches: High Court Orders MEIS Benefits for L&T Despite Systemic Challenges" "Human Discretion Prevails Over Technological Lapses in Granting Export Incentives"

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) regarding the grant of benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Quashes Decades-Old Show Cause Notice: Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied" "Excessive delay in adjudication renders the process violative of natural justice, says the Court."

The Bombay High Court quashed a 21-year-old adjudication process initiated by a show cause notice (SCN) issued in 2003 against M/s Esjaypee Impex Pvt....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Resolving the Jurisdiction of Customs Officers and DRI under Customs Act, 1962.

The Supreme Court addressed the powers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers as "proper officers" under the Customs Act, specifically ...