Search Results for "Date of Joining"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Compassionate Appointment Seniority Dispute. Retrospective Seniority Denied as Employee Joined Service a Decade After Initial Shortlisting, with No Court Direction or Rule Provision for Backdating.

The dispute arose from a compassionate appointment case where the respondent's father, a Home Guard, died in harness. The respondent applied for compa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Teachers in University Appointment Validity Dispute - Appointments Made Under Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 Remain Valid Despite University's Conversion to Central University Under Central Universities Act, 2009.

The dispute involved teachers appointed as Associate Professors/Assistant Professors in the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at H.N.B. Garhwal Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim Despite Employee's Pending Retirement Application. The Court held that approval of retirement after death cannot retrospectively cease service, and the case falls under the policy for death while in service.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the rejection of a compassionate appointment claim. The appellant's father, an employee of the State of...